Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38375329›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational immunology2024

Effective γδ T-cell clinical therapies: current limitations and future perspectives for cancer immunotherapy.

Isabella A Revesz, Paul Joyce, Lisa M Ebert, Clive A Prestidge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. CD31Physiological reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Adoptive T-cell therapies in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabella A ReveszClinical Health Sciences University of South Australia Adelaide SA Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2909-8614
Paul JoyceClinical Health Sciences University of South Australia Adelaide SA Australia.
Lisa M EbertCentre for Cancer Biology SA Pathology and University of South Australia Adelaide SA Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8041-9666
Clive A PrestidgeClinical Health Sciences University of South Australia Adelaide SA Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

γδ T cells are a unique subset of T lymphocytes, exhibiting features of both innate and adaptive immune cells and are involved with cancer immunosurveillance. They present an attractive alternative to conventional T cell-based immunotherapy due, in large part, to their lack of major histocompatibility (MHC) restriction and ability to secrete high levels of cytokines with well-known anti-tumour functions. To date, clinical trials using γδ T cell-based immunotherapy for a range of haematological and solid cancers have yielded limited success compared with

Indexed as

bisphosphonatescombination therapyimmunotherapylipid nanocarriersnanomedicineγδ T cells

Identifiers

PMID38375329
PMCPMC10875631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.