Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38375303›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Promising phytopharmacology, nutritional potential, health benefits, and traditional usage of

Muhammad Saeed, Mahzaib Munawar, Jannat Bi Bi, Shabbir Ahmed, Muhammad Zia Ahmad, Asghar Ali Kamboh, Muhammad Asif Arain, Muhammad Naveed, Huayou Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pharmacological activities ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phytochemical Evaluation ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad SaeedSchool of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Mahzaib MunawarThe Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Jannat Bi BiDepartment of Physical Education, Beijing Sports University, Beijing, China.
Shabbir AhmedFaculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Pakistan.
Muhammad Zia AhmadFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
Asghar Ali KambohFaculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Pakistan.
Muhammad Asif ArainFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.
Muhammad NaveedDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Medicine, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Huayou ChenSchool of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional medicines are becoming more popular as people become more aware of the dangers of synthetic pharmaceuticals.

Indexed as

FertilityHumanNutraceuticalPhytochemistryPoultryTribulus terrestris

Identifiers

PMID38375303
PMCPMC10875386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.