ArticleHeliyon2024
Imaging evaluation of disc position and status after temporomandibular joint arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing surgery.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explain the change of disc position at different over-corrected place after arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing surgery. Study design: Patients treated with temporomandibular joint arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing surgery were reviewed. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before, immediately after surgery and at 2-year follow-up. The position of disc was checked and the change was compared. Results: 133 patients were included in the final analysis with 203 TMJ sides. The incidence rate for anterior movement of the disc after surgery was 33.0 %. Disc repositioned between 12 and 1 o'clock showed smaller movement rate of 22.6 %, while higher movement rate of 53.6 % was seen when repositioned between 2 and 3 o'clock. Conclusions: After arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing surgery for ADD patients, the repositioned disc showed tendency to move forward. 12 to 1 o'clock was optional disc site for repositioning while excessive over-correction was not recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.