ArticleData in brief2024
In-situ analysis and quantitative dataset of the impact assessment of perceived level of exposure to pollution and health condition.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the challenges of rapid climate change evolution and the leading risk factor is increasing air pollution. This work aims to investigate the perceived level of exposure to pollution associated with health outcomes. The study involves two groups of people within the concentrated population of Ewekoro and Ota residents. Considerations were also given to staff of general hospital in the two towns. The resident in perception on pollution generated from the factories and the rate of exposure of the two were noted. The questionnaire totalling 652 was administered putting into the consideration the population and analysis using SPSS. From all indication, the perceived level of exposure and the health condition of the inhabitants in Ota and Ewekero. The measure taken by the government was seen to be high at 81 % compare to 45 % in Ota industrial estate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.