Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38375075›Full record

ReviewTherapeutics and clinical risk management2024

Challenges in the Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy in Adults: Current Perspectives.

Iris N van Doorn, Filip Eftimov, Luuk Wieske, Ivo N van Schaik, Camiel Verhamme

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iris N van DoornDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam Neuroscience and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5336-712X
Filip EftimovDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam Neuroscience and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0146-0776
Luuk WieskeDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam Neuroscience and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2522-4081
Ivo N van SchaikDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam Neuroscience and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9135-6664
Camiel VerhammeDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam Neuroscience and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0444-574X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) poses numerous challenges. The heterogeneous presentations of CIDP variants, its mimics, and the complexity of interpreting electrodiagnostic criteria are just a few of the many reasons for misdiagnoses. Early recognition and treatment are important to reduce the risk of irreversible axonal damage, which may lead to permanent disability. The diagnosis of CIDP is based on a combination of clinical symptoms, nerve conduction study findings that indicate demyelination, and other supportive criteria. In 2021, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and the Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) published a revision on the most widely adopted guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of CIDP. This updated guideline now includes clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP variants (previously termed atypical CIDP), updated supportive criteria, and sensory criteria as an integral part of the electrodiagnostic criteria. Due to its many rules and exceptions, this guideline is complex and misinterpretation of nerve conduction study findings remain common. CIDP is treatable with intravenous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids, and plasma exchange. The choice of therapy should be tailored to the individual patient's situation, taking into account the severity of symptoms, potential side effects, patient autonomy, and past treatments. Treatment responses should be evaluated as objectively as possible using disability and impairment scales. Applying these outcome measures consistently in clinical practice aids in recognizing the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of a treatment and facilitates timely consideration of alternative diagnoses or treatments. This review provides an overview of the current perspectives on the diagnostic process and first-line treatments for managing the disease.

Indexed as

CIDPdiagnosisimagingNCStreatment

Identifiers

PMID38375075
PMCPMC10875175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.