ArticleJournal of blood medicine2024
HIF2-α Expression in CML Patients Receiving Hydroxyurea Prior to Imatinib That Achieved Major Molecular Response (MMR) versus in Those Not Achieving MMR.
Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Currently, Imatinib (IM) which is a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), is the main treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Major molecular response (MMR) is used as therapeutic response. Resistance to IM may be caused by hypoxia which is regulated by hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 2-α. The role of HIF2-α is currently not researched extensively. This study aimed to analyse the differences in HIF-2α expression between chronic phase CML patients that achieved MMR and those that did not achieve MMR. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional method which analysed secondary data from whole blood samples in chronic phase CML patients aged 18-60 years that received hydroxyurea (HU) before IM, aged 18-60 years, received IM therapy for more than 12 months, and were willing to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria for this study were patients who were receiving IM at a dose of more than 400 mg/day. HIF-2α protein expression was examined using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Differences between HIF-2α protein expression in groups that achieved MMR versus not achieving MMR was analysed using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: A total of 79 subjects were obtained. The median HIF-2α was 90.56 pg/mg protein (3.01-4628.74). There was no statistically significant difference in expression of HIF-2α in the group that reached MMR and did not reach MMR, namely 123.45 pg/mg protein and 89.25 pg/mg protein respectively (p 0.718). Conclusion: This study found no statistically significant difference between HIF-2α expression level and MMR achievement of chronic phase CML patients who received HU before IM therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.