ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
Two different types of giant bleb formation following Ahmed Glaucoma valve implantation.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed-Onset Giant Bleb Formation and Persistent Intraocular Pressure Elevation in a Patient With COVID-19 and a Long-Term Ahmed Glaucoma Valve.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- A giant bleb over a non-valved tube successfully treated with compression sutures.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Tube Insertion of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Using a Micro-incision Scleral Tunnel Technique.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to present two different types of giant bleb formation following Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation: an anterior enlarged giant bleb and a posterior enlarged giant bleb. Observations: In Case 1, a 70-year-old Japanese male underwent AGV implantation for neovascular glaucoma in his right eye (OD). Preoperatively, the patient's intraocular pressure (IOP) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were 23 mmHg and 0.6, respectively, OD, while using 3 antiglaucoma topical medications. Two months post-surgery, the patient began experiencing double vision. Slit lamp evaluation revealed no abnormalities, IOP and BCVA were 24.0 mmHg and 0.8, respectively, OD. A posteriorly enlarged bleb in the superotemporal quadrant OD was found to be causing displacement on T2-weighted orbital MRI. The patient underwent surgical excision of the anterior bleb wall. By three weeks post-surgery, the double vision resolved; IOP and BCVA were 17 mmHg and 0.7, respectively, and a normal bleb in the slit lamp evaluation was identified OD. In Case 2, a 10-year-old Japanese female underwent AGV implantation for childhood glaucoma associated with congenital cataract OD. Preoperatively, IOP and BCVA were 30 mmHg and 0.5, respectively, OD, while using 3 antiglaucoma topical medications. She underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in addition to AGV implantation. Seven months post-surgery, slip lamp evaluation revealed an anteriorly enlarged giant bleb that only cause her a cosmetic concern. Conclusions and Importance: There are two types of giant bleb formation following AGV implantation based on the direction of the enlargement: an anterior enlarged giant bleb and a posterior enlarged giant bleb. The introduction of this classification contribute to better understanding and management of this unusual surgical complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.