Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38374915›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Soil fungal community is more sensitive than bacterial community to modified materials application in saline-alkali land of Hetao Plain.

Xiaolong Bai, En Zhang, Jinmin Wu, Donghai Ma, Chaohui Zhang, Bangyan Zhang, Yunpeng Liu, Zhi Zhang, Feng Tian, Hui Zhao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. EnhancingMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  14. Environmental Factors Drive the Biogeographic Pattern ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaolong BaiCollege of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
En ZhangCollege of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Jinmin WuCollege of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Donghai MaCollege of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Chaohui ZhangCollege of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Bangyan ZhangCollege of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Yunpeng LiuCollege of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Zhi ZhangCollege of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.
Feng TianTumote Right Banner Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Baotou, China.
Hui ZhaoTumote Right Banner Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Baotou, China.
Bin WangCollege of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil salinization has become a major challenge that severely threatens crop growth and influences the productivity of agriculture. It is urgent to develop effective management measures to improve saline-alkali soil. Thus, in this study, soil properties, microbial communities, and function under desulfurization gypsum (DE), soil amendment (SA), farm manure (FA), and co-application of desulfurization gypsum, soil amendment, and farm manure (TA) in a field experiment were examined by high-throughput sequencing. The results showed that the application of modified materials is an effective approach in improving saline-alkali soil, especially TA treatment significantly increased the content of available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), soil organic matter (SOM), and alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen (AHN) and decreased pH, bulk density (BD), and electrical conductivity (EC). The application of modified materials resulted in notable enhancement in fungal diversity and altered the composition and structure of the fungal community. Conversely, the effect on the bacterial community was comparatively minor, with changes limited to the structure of the community. Regarding the fungal community composition, Ascomycota, Mortierellomycota, and Basidiomycota emerged as the dominant phyla across all treatments. At each taxonomic level, the community composition exhibited significant variations in response to different modified materials, resulting in divergent soil quality. The TA treatment led to a decrease in Mortierellomycota and an increase in Ascomycota, potentially enhancing the ability to decompose organic matter and facilitate soil nutrient cycling. Additionally, the sensitivity of fungal biomarkers to modified materials surpassed that of the bacterial community. The impact of modified materials on soil microbial communities primarily stemmed from alterations in soil EC, AP, AK, and SOM. FUNGuild analysis indicated that the saprotroph trophic mode group was the dominant component, and the application of modified materials notably increased the symbiotroph group. PICRUSt analysis revealed that metabolism was the most prevalent functional module observed at pathway level 1. Overall, the application of modified materials led to a decrease in soil EC and an increase in nutrient levels, resulting in more significant alterations in the soil fungal community, but it did not dramatically change the soil bacterial community. Our study provides new insights into the application of modified materials in increasing soil nutrients and altering soil microbial communities and functions and provides a better approach for improving saline-alkali soil of Hetao Plain.

Indexed as

bacteriafungihigh-throughput sequencingmodified materialssaline–alkali soil

Identifiers

PMID38374915
PMCPMC10875129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.