ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2024
Focal stimulation of retinal ganglion cells using subretinal 3D microelectrodes with peripheral electrodes of opposite current.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the Gap: Integrated High-Density Microelectrode Arrays for Cellular, Organoid, and Clinical Electrophysiology.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Modulation of place cells using targeted stimulation with bidirectional microelectrode arrays enhances spatial learning speed in mice.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- A three-dimensional bipolar microneedle electrode array with local ground integrated at each sidewall for enhanced focal electric stimulation.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Advances in artificial vision systems: a comprehensive review of technologies, applications, and future directions.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- A novel GCaMP6f-RCS rat model for studying electrical stimulation in the degenerated retina.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Comparison of modulation efficiency between normal and degenerated primate retina.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subretinal prostheses have been developed to stimulate survived retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), indirectly following the physiological visual pathways. However, current spreading from the prosthesis electrode causes the activation of unintended RGCs, thereby limiting the spatial resolution of artificial vision. This study proposes a strategy for focal stimulation of RGCs using a subretinal electrode array, in which six hexagonally arranged peripheral electrodes surround a stimulating electrode. RGCs in an in-vitro condition were subretinally stimulated using a fabricated electrode array coated with iridium oxide, following the three different stimulation configurations (with no peripheral, six electrodes of opposite current, and six ground). In-vitro experiments showed that the stimulation with six electrodes of opposite current was most effective in controlling RGC responses with a high spatial resolution. The results suggest that the effective utilization of return electrodes, such as by applying an opposite current to them, could help reduce current spreading beyond the local area targeted for stimulation and elicit RGC responses only in the vicinity of the stimulating electrode. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-023-00342-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.