Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38374849›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Human Papillomavirus Infection (HPV) Prevalence in the Black Sea Region of Turkey: Primary HPV Screening for Cervical Cancer.

Mustafa Cengiz Dura, Hilal Aktürk, Özgür Aslan, Şükrü Yıldız, Mehmet Kefeli, Handan Çelik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mustafa Cengiz DuraObstetrics and Gynaecology, Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, TUR.
Hilal AktürkObstetrics and Gynaecology, Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, TUR.
Özgür AslanObstetrics and Gynaecology, Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Şükrü YıldızObstetrics and Gynaecology, Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.
Mehmet KefeliDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuzmayıs University, Samsun, TUR.
Handan ÇelikObstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuzmayıs University, Samsun, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePlanning vaccination and treatment options requires knowledge about the regional incidence of human papillomavirus infection (HPV) and its genotypes. The aim of our study was to determine the regional prevalence of HPV with genotypic subclassification and to evaluate the efficacy of HPV testing in cervical screening.  Material and Method: This retrospective cohort study analyzed records of 10,152 women aged 30-65 from the On Dokuz Mayıs University Medical Faculty's Gynecology Clinic, excluding those with a history of cervical disease, hysterectomy, or current pregnancy. Pre- and postmenopausal and total HPV prevalence were calculated. There was a total of 544 patients who underwent a colposcopic biopsy after cervical screening. The research focused on comparing the efficacy of Pap smears, HPV tests, and co-tests in detecting LSIL or more severe conditions, utilizing the BD Viper LT System for HPV screening and liquid-based cytology for smear tests.

resultsThe prevalence of HPV in our region was determined to be 10.9%. When considering menopausal status, HPV prevalence was found to be 9.8% in premenopausal individuals and 12.4% in postmenopausal individuals. Evaluation of the pap smear results revealed a sensitivity of 74.8% for premenopausal and 81% for postmenopausal patients, with a specificity of 51% observed in both menopausal categories. In contrast, HPV testing demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.8% in premenopausal and 92.4% in postmenopausal individuals, with a specificity of 58% for both groups. The co-test results indicated an even higher sensitivity, with 97.9% in premenopausal and 100% in postmenopausal individuals, albeit with a reduced specificity of 28% in both cases. When identifying LSIL (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) and more severe conditions, the sensitivity and specificity of the primary HPV test surpassed those of the pap smear. While the primary HPV test's sensitivity is markedly lower compared to the co-test, it boasts a significantly higher specificity.

conclusionRegional HPV prevalence studies are valuable for the implementation of screening policies. The primary HPV DNA test is a reliable method for detecting preinvasive and invasive lesions in patients over 30 years of age.

Indexed as

cancercervicalco-testhpvprevalencesmear

Identifiers

PMID38374849
PMCPMC10875909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.