ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Computer Vision and Machine-Learning Techniques for Automatic 3D Virtual Images Overlapping During Augmented Reality Guided Robotic Partial Nephrectomy.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The Use of Augmented Reality for Navigation in Minimally Invasive Abdominal and Thoracic Soft-Tissue Surgery: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring the Feasibility of an Insourced 3D-Imaging Reconstruction: Preliminary Series with the Use of Synapse3D™ Software.Cancers · 2026Article
- Global research trends and thematic evolution in fluorescence-guided robot-assisted urologic surgery: a bibliometric and visualized study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven real-time assistance in minimally invasive surgery: a technology-oriented narrative review.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in urology training Enhancing annotation, feedback, and evaluation in robotic, laparoscopic, and endoscopic surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Review
- Accuracy and reliability of an augmented reality prototype for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a preclinical study with 3D-printed kidney phantoms (UroCCR 168).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Utilising artificial intelligence to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy - a validation and feasibility study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Metaverse in surgery - origins and future potential.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Trends in artificial intelligence and machine learning for renal cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Predicting surgical outcomes in single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: external validation and comparative analysis of PADUA, RENAL, and SPARE scores.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Article
- The Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Current progress of digital twin construction using medical imaging.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Review
- Review
- Advances in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe research's purpose is to develop a software that automatically integrates and overlay 3D virtual models of kidneys harboring renal masses into the Da Vinci robotic console, assisting surgeon during the intervention.
introductionPrecision medicine, especially in the field of minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy, aims to use 3D virtual models as a guidance for augmented reality robotic procedures. However, the co-registration process of the virtual images over the real operative field is performed manually.
methodsIn this prospective study, two strategies for the automatic overlapping of the model over the real kidney were explored: the computer vision technology, leveraging the super-enhancement of the kidney allowed by the intraoperative injection of Indocyanine green for superimposition and the convolutional neural network technology, based on the processing of live images from the endoscope, after a training of the software on frames from prerecorded videos of the same surgery. The work-team, comprising a bioengineer, a software-developer and a surgeon, collaborated to create hyper-accuracy 3D models for automatic 3D-AR-guided RAPN. For each patient, demographic and clinical data were collected.
resultsTwo groups (group A for the first technology with 12 patients and group B for the second technology with 8 patients) were defined. They showed comparable preoperative and post-operative characteristics. Concerning the first technology the average co-registration time was 7 (3-11) seconds while in the case of the second technology 11 (6-13) seconds. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. There were no differences in terms of functional outcomes between the groups at every time-point considered.
conclusionThe first technology allowed a successful anchoring of the 3D model to the kidney, despite minimal manual refinements. The second technology improved kidney automatic detection without relying on indocyanine injection, resulting in better organ boundaries identification during tests. Further studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.