Trial reportJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2024
Faster discharge with lactated ringers than normal saline in first 72 h of acute pancreatitis: A multicenter randomized trial.
Trial report in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03242473 (Mitigating the Inflammatory Response in Acute Pancreatitis With Appropriate Fluid Management; A Randomized Clinical Control Trial Comparing the Effects of Lactated Ringers and Normal Saline), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mitigating the Inflammatory Response in Acute Pancreatitis With Appropriate Fluid Management; A Randomized Clinical Control Trial Comparing the Effects of Lactated Ringers and Normal Saline
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Normal saline vs. lactated ringer's for fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Lactated Ringer's solution versus saline fluid resuscitation for reducing progression to moderate-to-severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Fluid Resuscitation with Lactated Ringer vs. Normal Saline in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Acute Pancreatitis in Children: It's Not Just a Simple Attack.Gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Advances in the Management of Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesData driven strategies for acute pancreatitis (AP) in pediatrics are limited; adult data suggests lactated ringers (LR) compared to normal saline (NS) resulted in favorable outcomes, but has not been studied in pediatrics. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of LR during the first 48 h of an AP episode compared with NS. STUDY
designA multisite randomized controlled clinical trial, from 2015 to 2020 (Clinical Trials.gov NCT03242473). Patients were randomized to exclusively LR or NS for the first 48 h. Primary outcomes were serial C-reactive protein (CRP) values. Secondary outcomes included other lab values, time to feeds, length of stay (LOS), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) development, and progression to severe AP (SAP).
resultsWe studied 76 patients (38 LR, 38 NS). CRP at 24 and 48 h were not significantly different between LR or NS group. Additionally, there were no differences in trends of BUN, amylase, lipase, SIRS status, or SAP development between the LR and NS group at 24 and 48 h. A higher proportion of LR patients (32%, 12/38) were discharged before 48 h compared to NS (13%, 5/38). The LR group had a significantly higher rate of discharge within the first 72 h compared to the NS group (p = 0.02).
conclusionThe use of LR was associated with a faster rate of discharge during the intervention period and in the first 72 h, but no other differences compared to NS. This reduction in length of hospitalization has significant implications for patients and healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.