Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38374370›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Characterization of non-invasive oropharyngeal samples and nucleic acid isolation for molecular diagnostics.

Leonie Hose, Matthias Schürmann, Inga Mennebröcker, Rayoung Kim, Tobias Busche, Peter Goon, Holger Sudhoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonie HoseDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, University Hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Germany. leonie.hose@uni-bielefeld.de.
Matthias SchürmannDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, University Hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Germany.
Inga MennebröckerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, University Hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Germany.
Rayoung KimDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, University Hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Germany.
Tobias BuscheCenter for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), University Hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Peter GoonDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Holger SudhoffDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld Mitte, University Hospital OWL of Bielefeld University, Teutoburger Str. 50, 33604, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bielefeld University · DEKlinikum Bielefeld · DENational University Health System · SG

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13N15829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular diagnostics is an increasingly important clinical tool, especially in routine sampling. We evaluated two non-invasive methods (oral swabs and mouthwashes) for sampling nucleic acids from the oral/pharyngeal area. We created a workflow from sample collection (n = 59) to RT-qPCR based analysis. The samples were further characterized in terms of their cellular composition as well as the purity, degradation and microbial content of the derived DNA/RNA. We determined the optimal housekeeping genes applicable for these types of samples. The cellular composition indicated that mouthwashes contained more immune cells and bacteria. Even though the protocol was not specifically optimized to extract bacterial RNA it was possible to derive microbial RNA, from both sampling methods. Optimizing the protocol allowed us to generate stable quantities of DNA/RNA. DNA/RNA purity parameters were not significantly different between the two sampling methods. Even though integrity analysis demonstrated a high level of degradation of RNA, corresponding parameters confirmed their sequencing potential. RT-qPCR analysis determined TATA-Box Binding Protein as the most favorable housekeeping gene. In summary, we have developed a robust method suitable for multiple downstream diagnostic techniques. This protocol can be used as a foundation for further research endeavors focusing on developing molecular diagnostics for the oropharyngeal cavity.

Indexed as

Nucleic AcidsDNAMouthwashesPathology, MolecularRNADNAMouthwashesNucleic AcidsRNA

Identifiers

PMID38374370
PMCPMC10876689
OpenAlexW4391945319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.