ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Prevalence and risk factors for impaired activities of daily living in patients with neo-vascular age-related macular degeneration who present for anti-VEGF treatment.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTo assess the prevalence and correlates of impaired activities of daily living (ADLs) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who present for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.
methodsIn a clinic-based cohort of 437 patients with nAMD who presented for anti-VEGF therapy, the Older American Resources and Services Scale (OARS) was administered to assess for impairments in basic, instrumental and total ADL. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for factors associated with ADL impairment.
resultsThe prevalence of impaired basic, instrumental and total ADL was 37.76%, 67.82% and 39.59%, respectively. In multivariate-adjusted models, moderate visual impairment [OR 5.65, 95% CI (2.31-13.83) and blindness [OR 5.43, 95% CI (2.09-14.12)] were associated with greater odds of impaired total ADL. Depressive symptoms [OR 2.08, 95% CI (1.08-4.00)], the presence of any disability [OR 3.16, 95% CI (1.64-0.07)] and never driving [OR 4.00, 95% CI (1.60-10.00)] were also positively associated with total ADL impairment. Better vision-related quality of life (QoL) was inversely associated with impaired instrumental ADL whilst higher health-related QoL scores were associated with decreased odds of total ADL impairment.
conclusionsThere is a high prevalence rate of ADL impairment among nAMD patients presenting for therapy. Visual impairment, never driving, poor physical and mental health increased the odds of experiencing ADL impairment whilst better VRQoL and HRQoL reduced the odds of impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.