ArticleNature medicine2024
Selection, optimization and validation of ten chronic disease polygenic risk scores for clinical implementation in diverse US populations.
Article in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
159 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-ancestry polygenic risk scores for the prediction of type 2 diabetes and complications in diverse ancestries.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Genome-wide meta-analyses of cross substance use disorders in diverse populations.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Human genetic diversity across South Asian populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Development and pilot testing of a prostate cancer polygenic risk report.BMC medical genomics · 2026Trial
- Integrating breast cancer polygenic risk scores at scale in the WISDOM Study: a national randomized personalized screening trial.Genome medicine · 2025Trial
- All of Us diversity and scale yield context-dependent improvements in polygenic prediction.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- SPLENDID incorporates continuous genetic ancestry in biobank-scale data to improve polygenic risk prediction across diverse populations.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Recommendations for return of secondary genomic findings in observational cohort studies.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Polygenic risk scores in human genetics for study design discovery and translation.Human genetics · 2026Review
- Insights into the Complexities of Pharmacotherapy Parameters in Artificial Intelligence Models for Drug Selection, Precision Personalised Medicine and Optimal Therapeutic Outcomes.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Report in U.S.-Based Health Systems for 8 Cardiovascular Conditions.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Cross-ancestry and cross-disorder transferability of polygenic risk scores for obsessive-compulsive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- From polygenic risk to functional genomics: a framework for precision gynecological disease modeling.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Large-scale admixture mapping in the All of Us Research Program improves the characterization of cross-population phenotypic differences.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Pervasive interactions between exposures and polygenic risk can inform more effective clinical and behavioral interventions.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- The role of polygenic risk in Alzheimer's disease prediction for African Americans.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Observational
- Performance of Polygenic Risk Scores for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in theCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the use of machine and deep learning in genome-wide association studies: a comprehensive review.BioData mining · 2026Review
- ProLM: a plasma proteomics pretrained model for the general population.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A mixed-methods exploration of stakeholder experiences and perspectives on integrating polygenic breast cancer risk scores into Swedish clinical practice.BMC health services research · 2026Article
99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
79 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have improved in predictive performance, but several challenges remain to be addressed before PRSs can be implemented in the clinic, including reduced predictive performance of PRSs in diverse populations, and the interpretation and communication of genetic results to both providers and patients. To address these challenges, the National Human Genome Research Institute-funded Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network has developed a framework and pipeline for return of a PRS-based genome-informed risk assessment to 25,000 diverse adults and children as part of a clinical study. From an initial list of 23 conditions, ten were selected for implementation based on PRS performance, medical actionability and potential clinical utility, including cardiometabolic diseases and cancer. Standardized metrics were considered in the selection process, with additional consideration given to strength of evidence in African and Hispanic populations. We then developed a pipeline for clinical PRS implementation (score transfer to a clinical laboratory, validation and verification of score performance), and used genetic ancestry to calibrate PRS mean and variance, utilizing genetically diverse data from 13,475 participants of the All of Us Research Program cohort to train and test model parameters. Finally, we created a framework for regulatory compliance and developed a PRS clinical report for return to providers and for inclusion in an additional genome-informed risk assessment. The initial experience from eMERGE can inform the approach needed to implement PRS-based testing in diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.