Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38374327›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Green chemistry routed sugar press mud for (2D) ZnO nanostructure fabrication, mineral fortification, and climate-resilient wheat crop productivity.

Lahur Mani Verma, Ajay Kumar, Ashwani Kumar, Garima Singh, Umesh Singh, Shivani Chaudhary, Sachin Kumar, Anita Raj Sanwaria, Pravin P Ingole, Satyawati Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lahur Mani VermaBiomass Technology Laboratory, Centre for Rural Development and Technology (CRDT), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Room No. 289, Block-III, Main Building Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Ajay KumarBiomass Technology Laboratory, Centre for Rural Development and Technology (CRDT), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Room No. 289, Block-III, Main Building Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Ashwani KumarMetagenomics and Secretomics Research Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Allahabad (A Central University), Prayagraj, 211002, UP, India.
Garima SinghBiomass Technology Laboratory, Centre for Rural Development and Technology (CRDT), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Room No. 289, Block-III, Main Building Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Umesh SinghBiomass Technology Laboratory, Centre for Rural Development and Technology (CRDT), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Room No. 289, Block-III, Main Building Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Shivani ChaudharyBiommaterials and Bio-Interface Laboratory, Center for Biomedical Engineering IIT Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Sachin KumarBiommaterials and Bio-Interface Laboratory, Center for Biomedical Engineering IIT Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Anita Raj SanwariaBiomass Technology Laboratory, Centre for Rural Development and Technology (CRDT), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Room No. 289, Block-III, Main Building Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Pravin P IngoleElectrophysical Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, IIT Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Satyawati SharmaBiomass Technology Laboratory, Centre for Rural Development and Technology (CRDT), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD), Room No. 289, Block-III, Main Building Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India. satyawatis@hotmail.com.
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi · INUniversity of Allahabad · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology appears to be a promising tool to redefine crop nutrition in the coming decades. However, the crucial interactions of nanomaterials with abiotic components of the environment like soil organic matter (SOM) and carbon‒sequestration may hold the key to sustainable crop nutrition, fortification, and climate change. Here, we investigated the use of sugar press mud (PM) mediated ZnO nanosynthesis for soil amendment and nutrient mobilisation under moderately alkaline conditions. The positively charged (+ 7.61 mv) ZnO sheet-like nanoparticles (~ 17 nm) from zinc sulphate at the optimum dose of (75 mg/kg blended with PM (1.4% w/w) were used in reinforcing the soil matrix for wheat growth. The results demonstrated improved agronomic parameters with (~ 24%) and (~ 19%) relative increases in yield and plant Zn content. Also, the soil solution phase interactions of the ZnO nanoparticles with the PM-induced soil colloidal carbon (- 27.9 mv and diameter 0.4864 μm) along with its other components have influenced the soil nutrient dynamics and mineral ecology at large. Interestingly, one such interaction seems to have reversed the known Zn-P interaction from negative to positive. Thus, the study offers a fresh insight into the possible correlations between nutrient interactions and soil carbon sequestration for climate-resilient crop productivity.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesZinc OxideCarbonMineralsSoilSugarsTriticumCarbonMineralsSoilSugarsZinc Oxide

Identifiers

PMID38374327
PMCPMC10876626
OpenAlexW4391926724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.