ArticleScientific reports2024
Cooperative control of a DNA origami force sensor.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tunable DNA Origami Nanosensors for Detection of Multiscale Spatial Ion Concentration Gradients.ACS sensors · 2026Article
- Engineering a Mechanoresponsive DNA Origami Capsule for Drug Delivery to Narrowed Arteries.Nano letters · 2026Article
- The effect of long-term ambient storage on the morphology of adhered DNA origami.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Folding Dynamics of DNA Origami Structures.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Tunable DNA Origami Nanosensors for Detection of Multiscale Spatial Ion Concentration Gradients.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- DNA Origami-Based Luminescent Biosensors Enabling Smartphone Detection of Nucleic Acid Sequences.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Design and Assembly of a Cargo-Agnostic Hollow Two-Lidded DNA Origami Box.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecular systems are dependent on a complex interplay of forces. Modern force spectroscopy techniques provide means of interrogating these forces, but they are not optimized for studies in constrained environments as they require attachment to micron-scale probes such as beads or cantilevers. Nanomechanical devices are a promising alternative, but this requires versatile designs that can be tuned to respond to a wide range of forces. We investigate the properties of a nanoscale force sensitive DNA origami device which is highly customizable in geometry, functionalization, and mechanical properties. The device, referred to as the NanoDyn, has a binary (open or closed) response to an applied force by undergoing a reversible structural transition. The transition force is tuned with minor alterations of 1 to 3 DNA oligonucleotides and spans tens of picoNewtons (pN). The DNA oligonucleotide design parameters also strongly influence the efficiency of resetting the initial state, with higher stability devices (≳10 pN) resetting more reliably during repeated force-loading cycles. Finally, we show the opening force is tunable in real time by adding a single DNA oligonucleotide. These results establish the potential of the NanoDyn as a versatile force sensor and provide fundamental insights into how design parameters modulate mechanical and dynamic properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.