Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38374211›Full record

Observational studyInfectious diseases of poverty2024

Incidence and warning signs for complications of human brucellosis: a multi-center observational study from China.

Qing-Nan Shi, Hui-Jie Qin, Qiao-Shan Lu, Shu Li, Zhong-Fa Tao, Meng-Guang Fan, Mu-Heta Aishan, Zeng-Qiang Kou, Qiu-Lan Chen, Wen-Wu Yin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Hollow viscus perforation secondary to brucellosis: a rare case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Qing-Nan ShiNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changbai Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China.
Hui-Jie QinSchool of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Qiao-Shan LuSchool of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Shu LiNanning Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
Zhong-Fa TaoGuizhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guiyang, China.
Meng-Guang FanInner Mongolia Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hohhot, China.
Mu-Heta AishanXinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Urumqi, China.
Zeng-Qiang KouShandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, China.
Qiu-Lan ChenNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changbai Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China. chenql@chinacdc.cn.
Wen-Wu YinNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changbai Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China. yinww@chinacdc.cn.
Yan-Ping ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changbai Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China.
Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNGuangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNGuizhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNInner Mongolia Comprehensive Disease Prevention and Control Center · CNNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention · CNShandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNXinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Disease Prevention and Control Center · CN

Funding

the Public Health Emergency Response Mechanism Operation Program 102393220020010000017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucellosis is a severe zoonotic disease that is often overlooked, particularly in impoverished countries. Timely identification of focal complications in brucellosis is crucial for improving treatment outcomes. However, there is currently a lack of established indicators or biomarkers for diagnosing these complications. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate potential warning signs of focal complications in human brucellosis, with the goal of providing practical parameters for clinicians to aid in the diagnosis and management of patients.

methodsA multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted in China from December 2019 to August 2021. The study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and complications of patients with brucellosis using a questionnaire survey and medical record system. The presence of warning signs for complications was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used for variable screening and model evaluation.

resultsA total of 880 participants diagnosed with human brucellosis were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 50 years [interquartile range (IQR): 41.5-58.0], and 54.8% had complications. The most common organ system affected by complications was the osteoarticular system (43.1%), with peripheral arthritis (30.0%), spondylitis (16.6%), paravertebral abscess (5.0%), and sacroiliitis (2.7%) being the most prevalent. Complications in other organ systems included the genitourinary system (4.7%), respiratory system (4.7%), and hematologic system (4.6%). Several factors were found to be associated with focal brucellosis. These factors included a long delay in diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) = 3.963, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.906-8.238 for > 90 days], the presence of underlying disease (OR = 1.675, 95% CI 1.176-2.384), arthralgia (OR = 3.197, 95% CI 1.986-5.148), eye bulging pain (OR = 3.482, 95% CI 1.349-8.988), C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10 mg/L (OR = 1.910, 95% CI 1.310-2.784) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) elevation (OR = 1.663, 95% CI 1.145-2.415). The optimal cutoff value in ROC analysis was > 5.4 mg/L for CRP (sensitivity 73.4% and specificity 51.9%) and > 25 mm/h for ESR (sensitivity 47.9% and specificity 71.1%).

conclusionsMore than 50% of patients with brucellosis experienced complications. Factors such as diagnostic delay, underlying disease, arthralgia, eye pain, and elevated levels of CRP and ESR were identified as significant markers for the development of complications. Therefore, patients presenting with these conditions should be closely monitored for potential complications, regardless of their culture results and standard tube agglutination test titers.

Indexed as

BrucellosisDelayed DiagnosisAdultArthralgiaC-Reactive ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesC-Reactive ProteinBrucellosisClinical spectrumComplicationsWarning signs

Identifiers

PMID38374211
PMCPMC10877768
OpenAlexW4391969712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.