Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38374186›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024

Ecological niche conservatism spurs diversification in response to climate change.

Huijie Qiao, A Townsend Peterson, Corinne E Myers, Qinmin Yang, Erin E Saupe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huijie QiaoKey Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. qiaohj@ioz.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5345-6234
A Townsend PetersonBiodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0243-2379
Corinne E MyersDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-7378
Qinmin YangState Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, College of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1602-8986
Erin E SaupeDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. erin.saupe@earth.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0370-9897

Funding

Leverhulme Trust PrizeRCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/V011405/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lengthy debate has surrounded the theoretical and empirical science of whether climatic niche evolution is related to increased or decreased rates of biological diversification. Because species can persist for thousands to millions of years, these questions cross broad scales of time and space. Thus, short-term experiments may not provide comprehensive understanding of the system, leading to the emergence of contrasting opinions: niche evolution may increase diversity by allowing species to explore and colonize new geographic areas across which they could speciate; or, niche conservatism might augment biodiversity by supporting isolation of populations that may then undergo allopatric speciation. Here, we use a simulation approach to test how biological diversification responds to different rates and modes of niche evolution. We find that niche conservatism promotes biological diversification, whereas labile niches-whether adapting to the conditions available or changing randomly-generally led to slower diversification rates. These novel results provide a framework for understanding how Earth-life interactions produced such a diverse biota.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionClimate ChangeBiodiversityEcosystemPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID38374186
PMCPMC11009114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.