Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38374100›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Implementation of advance care planning in the routine care for acutely admitted patients in geriatric units: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Maria Romøren, Karin Berg Hermansen, Trygve Johannes Lereim Sævareid, Linn Brøderud, Siri Færden Westbye, Astrid Klopstad Wahl, Lisbeth Thoresen, Siri Rostoft, Reidun Førde, Marc Ahmed and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05681585 (Implementing Advanced Care Planning in the Routine Care for Acutely Admitted Patients in Geriatric Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05681585 narecruitingnot on this map

Implementing Advanced Care Planning in the Routine Care for Acutely Admitted Patients in Geriatric Units: a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OsloRan2023 to 2026Enrolled2,000ConditionsAdvance Care PlanningArmsImplementation support program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria RomørenCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. maria.romoren@medisin.uio.no.
Karin Berg HermansenDepartment for Health Sciences in Aalesund, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Aalesund, Norway.
Trygve Johannes Lereim SævareidCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Linn BrøderudCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Siri Færden WestbyeCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Astrid Klopstad WahlDepartment for Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lisbeth ThoresenDepartment for Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Siri RostoftDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Reidun FørdeCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Marc AhmedDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eline AasDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
May Helen MidtbustDepartment for Health Sciences in Aalesund, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Aalesund, Norway.
Reidar PedersenCentre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOOslo University Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

The Research Council of Norway 302880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcutely ill and frail older adults and their next of kin are often poorly involved in treatment and care decisions. This may lead to either over- or undertreatment and unnecessary burdens. The aim of this project is to improve user involvement and health services for frail older adults living at home, and their relatives, by implementing advance care planning (ACP) in selected hospital wards, and to evaluate the clinical and the implementation interventions.

methodsThis is a cluster randomized trial with 12 hospital units. The intervention arm receives implementation support for 18 months; control units receive the same support afterwards. The ACP intervention consists of 1. Clinical intervention: ACP; 2. Implementation interventions: Implementation team, ACP coordinator, network meetings, training and supervision for health care personnel, documentation tools and other resources, and fidelity measurements with tailored feedback; 3. Implementation strategies: leadership commitment, whole ward approach and responsive evaluation. Fidelity will be measured three times in the intervention arm and twice in the control arm. Here, the primary outcome is the difference in fidelity changes between the arms. We will also include 420 geriatric patients with one close relative and an attending clinician in a triadic sub-study. Here, the primary outcomes are quality of communication and decision-making when approaching the end of life as perceived by patients and next of kin, and congruence between the patient's preferences for information and involvement and the clinician's perceptions of the same. For patients we will also collect clinical data and health register data. Additionally, all clinical staff in both arms will be invited to answer a questionnaire before and during the implementation period. To explore barriers and facilitators and further explore the significance of ACP, qualitative interviews will be performed in the intervention units with patients, next of kin, health care personnel and implementation teams, and with other stakeholders up to national level. Lastly, we will evaluate resource utilization, costs and health outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis. DISCUSSION: The project may contribute to improved implementation of ACP as well as valuable knowledge and methodological developments in the scientific fields of ACP, health service research and implementation science.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05681585. Registered 03.01.23.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAgedHealth PersonnelHospitalizationHospitalsHumansPatientsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAcute admissionsAdvance care planningClinical ethicsComplex interventionGeriatric patientsHealth service researchImplementationOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID38374100
PMCPMC10875743
OpenAlexW4391943439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.