Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38373938›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

The bumpy ride to a medical PhD degree: a qualitative study on factors influencing motivation.

C R den Bakker, B W C Ommering, A J de Beaufort, F W Dekker, J Bustraan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C R den BakkerCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 23, Zone V7-P, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZD, Leiden, The Netherlands. c.r.den_bakker@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9693-7417
B W C OmmeringResearch Centre for Learning and Innovation, Research Group On Research Competence, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8673-4923
A J de BeaufortCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 23, Zone V7-P, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZD, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1990-2672
F W DekkerCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 23, Zone V7-P, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZD, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2433-2494
J BustraanCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 23, Zone V7-P, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZD, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4331-5312
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn parallel with a tremendous increase in medical PhD enrolments, concerns have risen about PhD candidates' poor well-being, increasing attrition rates for PhD programmes, and, eventually, a decline in clinician-scientists. According to the Self-Determination Theory, autonomous motivation is strongly linked to positive aspects of well-being and other positive outcomes such as study completion and success. In this way, motivation has a pivotal role in successful completion of medical doctoral programmes. In this study we explored factors affecting motivation during the PhD journey and aimed to contribute to engaging doctoral education environments, and, eventually, a sustainable clinician-scientist workforce.

methodsThis constructivist qualitative interview study was conducted among ten medical PhD candidates in the final phase of their PhD. We used timeline assisted interviews to identify meaningful experiences throughout their PhD journey. Thematic analyses as an iterative process resulted in overarching themes.

resultsWe identified six themes influencing autonomous and controlled motivation along the challenging PhD journey: (1) Initial motivation to start a PhD matters; (2) Autonomy as a matter of the right dose at the right time; (3) PhD as proof of competence and/or learning trajectory?; (4) It takes two to tango; (5) Peers can make or break your PhD; (6) Strategies to stay or get back on track.

conclusionThis study revealed factors that contribute positively and/or negatively to autonomous and controlled motivation. Some factors impacted motivation differently depending on the PhD phase and individual strategies. Additionally, some factors could coincide and change from positive to negative and vice versa, showing that a successful journey cannot simply be reduced to an absence of negative experiences.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateMotivationHumansLearningPersonal AutonomyQualitative ResearchClinician-scientistDoctoral educationMD-PhDMedical PhD programmesMotivationSelf-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID38373938
PMCPMC10875841
OpenAlexW4391926839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.