Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38373855›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Barriers and enablers to blood culture sampling in Indonesia, Thailand and Viet Nam: a Theoretical Domains Framework-based survey.

Pornpan Suntornsut, Koe Stella Asadinia, Ralalicia Limato, Alice Tamara, Linda W A Rotty, Rendra Bramanti, Dwi U Nusantara, Erni J Nelwan, Suwimon Khusuwan, Watthanapong Suphamongkholchaikul and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Pornpan SuntornsutMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Koe Stella AsadiniaOxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ralalicia LimatoOxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5306-3254
Alice TamaraOxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Linda W A RottyProf. Dr. R. D. Kandou Central Hospital, Manado, Indonesia.
Rendra BramantiDr. Iskak District Hospital, Tulungagung, Indonesia.
Dwi U NusantaraPasar Minggu District Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Erni J NelwanFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4064-5412
Suwimon KhusuwanChiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Watthanapong SuphamongkholchaikulSunpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Parinya ChamnanSunpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Watcharapong PiyaphaneeHospital for Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Huong Thi Lan VuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.ORCID 0000-0002-9579-5576
Yen Hai NguyenOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
Khanh Hong NguyenOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
Thach Ngoc PhamNational Hospital of Tropical Diseases, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Quang Minh LeViet Tiep Hospital, Hai Phong, Viet Nam.
Vinh Hai VuViet Tiep Hospital, Hai Phong, Viet Nam.ORCID 0000-0001-6130-7864
Duc Minh ChauDong Thap Hospital, My Tan, Viet Nam.
Dung Em Thi Hoang VoDong Thap Hospital, My Tan, Viet Nam.
Elinor K HarrissBodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Hindrik Rogier van DoornCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Raph Leonardus HamersOxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5007-7896
Fabiana LorencattoCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
Lou AtkinsCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
Direk LimmathurotsakulMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand direk@tropmedres.ac.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-5320

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBlood culture (BC) sampling is recommended for all suspected sepsis patients prior to antibiotic administration. We examine barriers and enablers to BC sampling in three Southeast Asian countries.

designA Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)-based survey, comprising a case scenario of a patient presenting with community-acquired sepsis and all 14 TDF domains of barriers/enablers to BC sampling.

settingHospitals in Indonesia, Thailand and Viet Nam, December 2021 to 30 April 2022.

participants1070 medical doctors and 238 final-year medical students were participated in this study. Half of the respondents were women (n=680, 52%) and most worked in governmental hospitals (n=980, 75.4%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Barriers and enablers to BC sampling.

resultsThe proportion of respondents who answered that they would definitely take BC in the case scenario was highest at 89.8% (273/304) in Thailand, followed by 50.5% (252/499) in Viet Nam and 31.3% (157/501) in Indonesia (p<0.001). Barriers/enablers in nine TDF domains were considered key in influencing BC sampling, including 'priority of BC (TDF-goals)', 'perception about their role to order or initiate an order for BC (TDF-social professional role and identity)', 'perception that BC is helpful (TDF-beliefs about consequences)', 'intention to follow guidelines (TDF-intention)', 'awareness of guidelines (TDF-knowledge)', 'norms of BC sampling (TDF-social influence)', 'consequences that discourage BC sampling (TDF-reinforcement)', 'perceived cost-effectiveness of BC (TDF-environmental context and resources)' and 'regulation on cost reimbursement (TDF-behavioural regulation)'. There was substantial heterogeneity between the countries. In most domains, the lower (higher) proportion of Thai respondents experienced the barriers (enablers) compared with that of Indonesian and Vietnamese respondents. A range of suggested intervention types and policy options was identified.

conclusionsBarriers and enablers to BC sampling are varied and heterogenous. Cost-related barriers are more common in more resource-limited countries, while many barriers are not directly related to cost. Context-specific multifaceted interventions at both hospital and policy levels are required to improve diagnostic stewardship practices.

Indexed as

Blood CultureSepsisFemaleHumansIndonesiaMaleQualitative ResearchThailandVietnamDiagnostic microbiologyINFECTIOUS DISEASESMICROBIOLOGYPublic HospitalsQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38373855
PMCPMC10882306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.