Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38373812›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2024

Smartwatch detection of new-onset monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in pregnancy.

Jenny Y Mei, Liwen Xu, Tina A Nguyen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jenny Y MeiObstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA jennyyangmei@gmail.com.
Liwen XuObstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Tina A NguyenObstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartwatches provide health tracking in various ways and there has been a recent rise in reporting cardiac arrhythmias. While original studies focused on atrial fibrillation, fewer reports have been made on other arrhythmias especially in pregnancy. We report a pregnant patient who presented at 34 weeks' gestation with palpitations. An ECG recorded through her Apple Watch showed ventricular tachycardia. Hospital ECG confirmed monomorphic ventricular tachycardia likely caused by increased sympathetic tone from the gravid state. She was admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit for close monitoring with intravenous anti-arrhythmic agents; however, the rhythm persisted. She underwent a caesarean delivery and the arrhythmia resolved post partum. She later underwent a catheter ablation, after which she discontinued all anti-arrhythmic medications with no recurrence. This case highlights the importance of requesting relevant digital health information, if available, from patients in our modern era. Controlled clinical studies are needed to validate such practices.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationTachycardia, VentricularAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsCardiac Pacing, ArtificialElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansPregnancyAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsArrhythmiasHealth informaticsObstetrics and gynaecologyPacing and electrophysiologyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38373812
PMCPMC10882298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.