Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38373307›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024

The Role of Force Fields and Water Models in Protein Folding and Unfolding Dynamics.

Anna-Lena M Fischer, Anna Tichy, Janik Kokot, Valentin J Hoerschinger, Robert F Wild, Jakob R Riccabona, Johannes R Loeffler, Franz Waibl, Patrick K Quoika, Philipp Gschwandtner and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In silico evolution of globular protein folds from random sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anna-Lena M FischerInstitute for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Anna TichyInstitute for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Janik KokotInstitute for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Valentin J HoerschingerInstitute for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Robert F WildInstitute for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Jakob R RiccabonaInstitute for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Johannes R LoefflerInstitute for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5724-655X
Franz WaiblDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Patrick K QuoikaCenter for Protein Assemblies (CPA), Physics Department, Chair of Theoretical Biophysics, Technical University of Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6227-5443
Philipp GschwandtnerResearch Center HPC, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefano ForliDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Andrew B WardDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Klaus R LiedlInstitute for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-2299
Martin ZachariasCenter for Protein Assemblies (CPA), Physics Department, Chair of Theoretical Biophysics, Technical University of Munich, D-80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-2663
Monica L Fernández-QuinteroInstitute for General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6811-6283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein folding is a fascinating, not fully understood phenomenon in biology. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are an invaluable tool to study conformational changes in atomistic detail, including folding and unfolding processes of proteins. However, the accuracy of the conformational ensembles derived from MD simulations inevitably relies on the quality of the underlying force field in combination with the respective water model. Here, we investigate protein folding, unfolding, and misfolding of fast-folding proteins by examining different force fields with their recommended water models, i.e., ff14SB with the TIP3P model and ff19SB with the OPC model. To this end, we generated long conventional MD simulations highlighting the perks and pitfalls of these setups. Using Markov state models, we defined kinetically independent conformational substates and emphasized their distinct characteristics, as well as their corresponding state probabilities. Surprisingly, we found substantial differences in thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding, depending on the combination of the protein force field and water model, originating primarily from the different water models. These results emphasize the importance of carefully choosing the force field and the respective water model as they determine the accuracy of the observed dynamics of folding events. Thus, the findings support the hypothesis that the water model is at least equally important as the force field and hence needs to be considered in future studies investigating protein dynamics and folding in all areas of biophysics.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingWaterMolecular ConformationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProteinsProtein UnfoldingThermodynamicsProteinsWater

Identifiers

PMID38373307
PMCPMC10938642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.