Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38373213›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2024

Anogenital distance in a cohort of 169 infant boys with uni- or bilateral cryptorchidism including 18 boys with vanishing testes.

Dina Cortes, Margit Bistrup Fischer, Andrea E Hildorf, Erik Clasen-Linde, Simone Hildorf, Anders Juul, Katharina M Main, Jorgen Thorup

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anogenital distance in patients with Klinefelter syndrome.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dina CortesDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Margit Bistrup FischerDepartment of Growth and Reproduction and EDMaRC, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andrea E HildorfDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erik Clasen-LindeDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Simone HildorfDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6639-0625
Anders JuulDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0534-4350
Katharina M MainDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jorgen ThorupDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-1107
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDo different boys with different types of cryptorchidism exhibit different anogenital distances (AGDs)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Length of AGD seemed to differ in different groups of patients with cryptorchidism. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: AGD, which is used as an indicator of prenatal androgen action, tends to be shorter in boys with cryptorchidism compared to unaffected boys. Shorter AGDs have also been reported in boys with hypospadias, in men with poor semen quality, and in men with testicular cancer. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A prospective descriptive cohort study was performed using data from consecutively selected boys with cryptorchidism (n = 169) operated in a single center over a period of 3 years (September 2019 to October 2022). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsAGD was measured in 169 infant boys, at 3 to 26 months of age, during anesthesia with a vernier caliper measuring the distance from the anus to the base of the scrotum (AGDAS) and from the anus to the anterior base of the penis (AGDAP) in two body positions according to the methods by 'The Infant Development and the Environment Study' (TIDES) and 'Cambridge Baby Growth Study', resulting in four mean values per patient (TIDES AGDAS/AP and Cambridge AGDAS/AP). Normal values for AGD by age were set by our hospital Department of Growth and Reproduction based on a large cohort of healthy infant boys (n = 1940). Testicular biopsies were performed at orchidopexy as a clinical routine. The germ cell number (G/T) and type Ad spermatogonia number (AdS/T) per cross-sectional tubule of at least 100 and 250 tubules, respectively were measured and related to normal samples. Blood samples were obtained by venipuncture for measuring serum LH, FSH, and inhibin B. They were analyzed in our hospital Department of Growth and Reproduction where the normal reference was also established. Correlations between the four mean AGD measurements for each boy were evaluated by Spearman rank correlation analyses. The AGD measurement of every boy was transferred to the multiple of the median (MoM) of the normal AGD for age and named MoM AGD. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 104 boysoperated for unilateral, and 47 boys operated for bilateral, undescended testes, whereas 18 boys had vanished testis including one boy with bilateral vanished testes. Only 6% of cases with vanished testes had a MoM AGD higher than the normal median compared to 32% with undescended testes (P < 0.05). MoM AGD increased with the age at surgery for boys with vanished testis (Spearman r = 0.44), but not for boys with undescended testes (Spearman r = 0.14). Boys with bilateral cryptorchidism had longer AGDs and more often had hypogonadotropic hypogonadism than boys with unilateral cryptorchidism (P < 0.005) and (P < 0.000001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although being the largest published material of AGD measurements of infant boys with cryptorchidism, one limitation of this study covers the quite small number of patients in the different groups, which may decrease the statistical power. Another limitation involves the sparse normal reference material on G/T and AdS/T. Finally, there are currently no longitudinal studies evaluating AGD from birth to adulthood and evaluating childhood AGD in relation to fertility outcome. Our study is hypothesis generating and therefore the interpretation of the results should be regarded as exploratory rather than reaching definite conclusions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe study findings are in agreement with literature as the total included group of boys with cryptorchidism exhibited shorter than normal AGDs. However, new insights were demonstrated. Boys with vanished testis had shorter AGDs compared to unaffected boys and to boys with undescended testes. This finding challenges the current concept of AGD being determined in 'the masculinization programming window' in Week 8 to 14 of gestation. Furthermore, boys with bilateral cryptorchidism had longer AGDs and more often had hypogonadotropic hypogonadism than boys with unilateral cryptorchidism, suggesting that the lack of fetal androgen in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is not that significant. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used and no competing interests are declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial was not registered in an ICMJE-recognized trial registry.

Indexed as

CryptorchidismGonadal Dysgenesis, 46,XYHypogonadismTesticular NeoplasmsAndrogensChildCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalePregnancyProspective StudiesSemen AnalysisTestisAndrogensandrogenanogenital distancecryptorchidismgerm cellsgonadotropinstestes

Identifiers

PMID38373213
PMCPMC10988100
OpenAlexW4391924635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.