Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38372960›Full record

ArticleFood and environmental virology2024

Transmission of Viruses from Restroom Use: A Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.

Sarah E Abney, Ciara A Higham, Amanda M Wilson, M Khalid Ijaz, Julie McKinney, Kelly A Reynolds, Charles P Gerba

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food and environmental virology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Wells-Riley Model Revisited II: Parameter Uncertainty and Population Heterogeneity.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah E AbneyDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Ciara A HighamEPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Fluid Dynamics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Amanda M WilsonDepartment of Community, Environment, & Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
M Khalid IjazGlobal Research & Development for Lysol and Dettol, Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Montvale, NJ, USA.
Julie McKinneyGlobal Research & Development for Lysol and Dettol, Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Montvale, NJ, USA.
Kelly A ReynoldsDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Charles P GerbaDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. gerba@ag.arizona.edu.
University of Arizona · USReckitt Benckiser (United States) · USEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · GB

Funding

EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Fluid Dynamics EP/S022732/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restroom use has been implicated in a number of viral outbreaks. In this study, we apply quantitative microbial risk assessment to quantify the risk of viral transmission by contaminated restroom fomites. We estimate risk from high-touch fomite surfaces (entrance/exit door, toilet seat) for three viruses of interest (SARS-CoV-2, adenovirus, norovirus) through eight exposure scenarios involving differing user behaviors, and the use of hand sanitizer following each scenario. We assessed the impacts of several sequences of fomite contacts in the restroom, reflecting the variability of human behavior, on infection risks for these viruses. Touching of the toilet seat was assumed to model adjustment of the seat (open vs. closed), a common touch point in single-user restrooms (home, small business, hospital). A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted for each exposure scenario (10,000 simulations each). Norovirus resulted in the highest probability of infection for all exposure scenarios with fomite surfaces. Post-restroom automatic-dispensing hand sanitizer use reduced the probability of infection for each virus by up to 99.75%. Handwashing within the restroom, an important risk-reduction intervention, was not found to be as effective as use of a non-touch hand sanitizer dispenser for reducing risk to near or below 1/1,000,000, a commonly used risk threshold for comparison.

Indexed as

Hand SanitizersNorovirusVirusesFomitesHumansRisk AssessmentToilet FacilitiesHand SanitizersFomitesHygienePublic healthQMRAVirus

Identifiers

PMID38372960
PMCPMC10963455
OpenAlexW4391926751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.