ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
Quantitative calibration of Tb-161 SPECT/CT in view of personalised dosimetry assessment studies.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving image quality in terbium-161 phantom imaging: Quantitative evaluation of DEW and TEW scatter correction methods.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- QuantitativeEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Quantitative performance of a 3D CZT and conventional SPECT/CT for Tb-161 imaging.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Quantitative terbium-161 SPECT/CT imaging: demonstrating the feasibility of image-based dosimetry and highlighting pitfalls.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Potentials and practical challenges of terbium-161 labeled radiopharmaceuticals.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025Article
- Bridging physics and practice: evaluating sensitivity, septal penetration, and detector dead time in terbium-161 gamma-camera imaging.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Framework to calculateMedical physics · 2025Article
- Influence of dosimetry accuracy on the correlation with treatment outcome in a preliminary PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Quantitative SPECT imaging ofEJNMMI physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTerbium-161 (
methodsSerial imaging of a NEMA/IEC body phantom with Tb-161 was performed on SPECT/CT with low-energy high-resolution collimators employing a photopeak of 75 keV with a 20% width. Quantitative stability and recovery coefficients were investigated over a sequence of 19 scans with buffered
resultsSphere recovery coefficients were 0.60 ± 0.05, 0.52 ± 0.07, 0.45 ± 0.07, 0.39 ± 0.07, 0.28 ± 0.08, and 0.20 ± 0.08 for spheres 37, 28, 22, 17, 13, and 10mm, respectively, when considered across all activity and scan durations with dual-energy window scatter correction. Whole-field reconstructed sensitivity was calculated as 1.42E-5 counts per decay. Qualitatively, images exhibited no visual artefacts and were comparable to
conclusionsQuantitative SPECT/CT of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.