Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38372942›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

Evaluation of the effect of sagging correction calibration errors in radiotherapy software on image matching.

Yumi Yamazawa, Akitane Osaka, Yasushi Fujii, Takahiro Nakayama, Kunio Nishioka, Yoshinori Tanabe

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yumi YamazawaDepartment of Radiology, Niigata Prefectural Central Hospital, 205, Shin-minamimachi, Niigata, 205943-0192, Japan.
Akitane OsakaDepartment of Radiology, Niigata Prefectural Central Hospital, 205, Shin-minamimachi, Niigata, 205943-0192, Japan.
Yasushi FujiiDepartment of Radiology, Chugoku Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, 148-13, Miyuki, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, 720-2121, Japan.
Takahiro NakayamaDepartment of Radiology, Chugoku Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, 148-13, Miyuki, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, 720-2121, Japan.
Kunio NishiokaDepartment of Radiology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, 1-1 Kodacho, Shunan, Yamaguchi, 745-8522, Japan.
Yoshinori TanabeFaculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1, Shikata, Kita, Okayama, 700-8525, Japan. tanabey@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7259-3317

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP23K07063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the impact of sagging correction calibration errors in radiotherapy software on image matching. Three software applications were used, with and without a polymethyl methacrylate rod supporting the ball bearings (BB). The calibration error for sagging correction across nine flex maps (FMs) was determined by shifting the BB positions along the Left-Right (LR), Gun-Target (GT), and Up-Down (UD) directions from the reference point. Lucy and pelvic phantom cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images underwent auto-matching after modifying each FM. Image deformation was assessed in orthogonal CBCT planes, and the correlations among BB shift magnitude, deformation vector value, and differences in auto-matching were analyzed. The average difference in analysis results among the three softwares for the Winston-Lutz test was within 0.1 mm. The determination coefficients (R

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingSoftwareCalibrationHumansPelvisDeformable registrationImage matchingRadiotherapySagging correctionWinston–Lutz test

Identifiers

PMID38372942
PMCPMC11166816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.