Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38372907›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2024

Interobserver variability in thyroid ultrasound.

Joaquín de Carlos, Javier Garcia, Francisco Javier Basterra, Jose Javier Pineda, M Dolores Ollero, Marta Toni, Patricia Munarriz, Emma Anda

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07296575 (A Multicenter Study on Multimodal Diagnosis and Process Optimization of Thyroid Diseases Based on Ultrasonic Intelligent Agents), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07296575 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Study on Multimodal Diagnosis and Process Optimization of Thyroid Diseases Based on Ultrasonic Intelligent Agents

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled2,000ConditionsThyroid Abnormalities, Thyroid, Thyroid CancerArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Research progress on deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis of thyroid nodules using ultrasound imaging].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Thyroid intelligent diagnosis based on THMSNet.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joaquín de CarlosEndocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain. decarlosjoaquin@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5875-4524
Javier GarciaEndocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Francisco Javier BasterraEndocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Jose Javier PinedaEndocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
M Dolores OlleroEndocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Marta ToniEndocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Patricia MunarrizEndocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Emma AndaEndocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUltrasound evaluation of thyroid nodules is the preferred technique, but it is dependent on operator interpretation, leading to inter-observer variability. The current study aimed to determine the inter-physician consensus on nodular characteristics, risk categorization in the classification systems, and the need for fine needle aspiration puncture.

methodsFour endocrinologists from the same center blindly evaluated 100 ultrasound images of thyroid nodules from 100 different patients. The following ultrasound features were evaluated: composition, echogenicity, margins, calcifications, and microcalcifications. Nodules were also classified according to ATA, EU-TIRADS, K-TIRADS, and ACR-TIRADS classifications. Krippendorff's alpha test was used to assess interobserver agreement.

resultsThe interobserver agreement for ultrasound features was: Krippendorff's coefficient 0.80 (0.71-0.89) for composition, 0.59 (0.47-0.72) for echogenicity, 0.73 (0.57-0.88) for margins, 0.55 (0.40-0.69) for calcifications, and 0.50 (0.34-0.67) for microcalcifications. The concordance for the classification systems was 0.7 (0.61-0.80) for ATA, 0.63 (0.54-0.73) for EU-TIRADS, 0.64 (0.55-0.73) for K-TIRADS, and 0.68 (0.60-0.77) for K-TIRADS. The concordance in the indication of fine needle aspiration puncture (FNA) was 0.86 (0.71-1), 0.80 (0.71-0.88), 0.77 0.67-0.87), and 0.73 (0.64-0.83) for systems previously described respectively.

conclusionsInterobserver agreement was acceptable for the identification of nodules requiring cytologic study using various classification systems. However, limited concordance was observed in risk stratification and many ultrasonographic characteristics of the nodules.

Indexed as

Observer VariationThyroid GlandThyroid NoduleUltrasonographyAdultAgedBiopsy, Fine-NeedleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedInterobserver agreementInterobserver variabilityThyroid noduleThyroid ultrasoundUltrasound classification systems

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.