Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38372858›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2024

Echogenomics: Echocardiography in Heritable Aortopathies.

Lyndsey Hunter-Adamson, Seda Tierney

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lyndsey Hunter-AdamsonDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, 750 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Seda TierneyDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, 750 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA. tierneys@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aim of this article is to review the current echocardiographic considerations in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with inherited aortopathies. RECENT

findingsAortic dilation is a key feature in heritable aortopathies, and dissection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. New genetic and histopathologic findings are helpful in better understanding these conditions. Non-invasive imaging modalities, including echocardiogram, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, are essential in monitoring these patients, as well as providing new prognostic factors of arterial stiffness that may help with risk stratification in the future. Diagnosis of heritable aortopathies should be considered with identification of aortic root dilation, particularly in children and young adults, or when there is a family history of aortic disease. Recent adult consensus guidelines highlight the importance of underlying genotype and phenotypic features when considering prophylactic surgical intervention. There are currently no consensus pediatric guidelines.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildGenotypeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingYoung AdultAortopathyBicuspid Aortic ValveEchocardiographyEchogenomicsLoeys Dietz SyndromeMarfan Syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.