ArticleMolecular diversity2024
Investigation of bacterial DNA gyrase Inhibitor classification models and structural requirements utilizing multiple machine learning methods.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- GNPS Untargeted GC-MS Metabolomic Analysis of Essential Oils From Duguetia lanceolata and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Dual inhibition of AChE and MAO-B in Alzheimer's disease: machine learning approaches and model interpretations.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Infections from multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria have emerged as a paramount global health concern, and the therapeutic effectiveness of current treatments is swiftly diminishing. An urgent need exists to explore innovative strategies for countering drug-resistant bacteria. Bacterial DNA gyrase, functioning as an ATP-dependent enzyme, plays a pivotal role in the intricate processes of transcription, replication, and chromosome segregation within bacterial DNA. This renders it a prime target for the development of innovative antibacterial agents. However, the experimental identification of bacterial DNA gyrase inhibitors faces multifaceted challenges due to current methodological constraints. Recognizing its significance, this study developed 56 computational models designed for predicting bacterial DNA gyrase inhibitors. These models employed seven distinct molecular fingerprints and eight machine learning algorithms. Among these models, Model_2D, created using KlekotaRoth fingerprints and the SVM algorithm, stands out as the most robust performer (ACC = 0.86, MCC = 0.63, G-mean = 0.82). Moreover, given the limited exploration of structural fragments required for DNA Gyrase B inhibitors, crucial structural fingerprints influencing DNA Gyrase B inhibitors were identified through Bayesian classification. Subsequently, we conducted molecular docking to reveal the binding modes between these crucial structural fingerprints and the active site of DNA gyrase B. In conclusion, the present study aimed to develop the optimal classification model for bacterial DNA gyrase inhibitors, offering invaluable support to medicinal chemists creating innovative DNA gyrase inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.