Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38372803›Full record

ArticleHNO2024

[How much digitization do ENT curricula need? : Opportunities and limits from the perspective of students and teachers].

Lisa Schmitz, Christian S Betz, Arne Böttcher, Sophia M Häußler, Mark Praetorius

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa SchmitzKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland. l.schmitz@uke.de.
Christian S BetzKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Arne BöttcherKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Sophia M HäußlerKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Mark PraetoriusKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigitalization has long been an integral part of students' everyday lives and increasingly also of their medical training. It seems to be an unwritten law that "digital natives" want as much digitalization as possible. This study aims to shed more light on how students in the clinical phase of medical studies perceive the increasing digitalization of teaching and what they need for good education. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study analyzed two surveys that were conducted using an online questionnaire. On the one hand, students in the 5th-9th semesters of the medical faculty at the University of Hamburg (n = 282) were surveyed (survey 1). Another survey addressed all employees of ENT clinics in Germany (n = 175; survey 2).

resultsA total of 76 students took part in survey 1 and 123 lecturers in survey 2. The results show that both students and lecturers do not want face-to-face teaching to be completely replaced by digital formats. A total of 72.7% of students reject the possibility of teaching practical skills through digital formats. The majority of students surveyed stated that offline formats improve their concentration (61.1%), participation probability (63.9%), and motivation to learn (76.6%). In contrast, 40.2% of lecturers see digitalization as a way to reduce the workload without any relevant loss in teaching quality.

conclusionDigital teaching formats have a negative impact on the medical education of the students surveyed. Interaction and physical presence are needed to increase the motivation to learn. This leads to the first conclusion that students are critical of the increasing digitalization of medical studies.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCurriculumOtolaryngologyStudents, MedicalAdultAttitude to ComputersComputer-Assisted InstructionFaculty, MedicalFemaleGermanyHumansMaleNeeds AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDigital technologyInteractive learningMedical studentsMotivationSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID38372803
PMCPMC11045585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.