ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024
Current look at the most promising proteomic and glycomic biomarkers of bladder cancer.
Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abnormal Sialylation Promotes Chemotherapy Resistance in Bladder Cancer via the PI3K-AKT-mTOR Signaling Pathway.Cancers · 2026Article
- Glycosylation of Extracellular Vesicles: Analytical and Translational Insights into Biomarker Discovery and Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Orosomucoid 1 interacts with S100A12 and activates ERK signalling to expedite the advancement of bladder cancer.Cell adhesion & migration · 2025Article
- LINC01082 inhibits malignant phenotypes of bladder cancer through sponging miR-1269a.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Values of Electrochemiluminescent Detection of Urinary CYFRA21-1 and FDP and Their Combined Detection in Bladder Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic and Predictive Potential of CCL5 Expression in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Bladder Cancer Treatments in the Age of Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Potential Radiosensitivity Biomarkers.Biomarker insights · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBladder cancer (BC) belongs to the most frequent cancer types. The diagnostic process is still long and costly, with a high percentage of false-positive or -negative results. Due to the cost and lack of effectiveness, older methods need to be supplemented or replaced by a newer more reliable method. In this regard, proteins and glycoproteins pose high potential.
methodsWe performed an online search in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to find relevant studies published in English up until May 2023. If applicable, we set the AUC threshold to 0.90 and sensitivity/specificity (SN/SP) to 90%.
findingsProtein and glycoprotein biomarkers are a demonstrably viable option in BC diagnostics. Cholinesterase shows promise in progression-free survival. BLCA-4, ORM-1 along with HTRA1 in the detection of BC. Matrix metallopeptidase 9 exhibits potential for stratification of muscle-invasive subtypes with high negative predictive value for aggressive phenotypes. Distinguishing non-muscle invasive subtypes benefits from Keratin 17. Neu5Gc-modified UMOD glycoproteins pose potential in BC diagnosis, while fibronectin, laminin-5, collagen type IV, and lamprey immunity protein in early detection of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.