Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371984›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Comparison of in-office and at-home bleaching techniques: An umbrella review of efficacy and post-operative sensitivity.

Maria Aidos, Carlos Miguel Marto, Inês Amaro, Mariangela Cernera, Inês Francisco, Francisco Vale, Manuel Marques-Ferreira, Bárbara Oliveiros, Gianrico Spagnuolo, Eunice Carrilho and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of Ozonized Oil on At-Home Tooth Bleaching: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria AidosUniv Coimbra, Institute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.
Carlos Miguel MartoUniv Coimbra, Institute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.
Inês AmaroUniv Coimbra, Institute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.
Mariangela CerneraDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples, "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Inês FranciscoUniv Coimbra, Laboratory for Evidence-Based Sciences and Precision Dentistry, Coimbra, Portugal.
Francisco ValeUniv Coimbra, Laboratory for Evidence-Based Sciences and Precision Dentistry, Coimbra, Portugal.
Manuel Marques-FerreiraUniv Coimbra, Laboratory for Evidence-Based Sciences and Precision Dentistry, Coimbra, Portugal.
Bárbara OliveirosUniv Coimbra, Laboratory for Evidence-Based Sciences and Precision Dentistry, Coimbra, Portugal.
Gianrico SpagnuoloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples, "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Eunice CarrilhoUniv Coimbra, Institute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.
Ana CoelhoUniv Coimbra, Institute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.
Anabela Baptista PaulaUniv Coimbra, Institute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.
University of Coimbra · PTUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this umbrella review is to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of different teeth whitening techniques in-office (IO) and at-home (AH), regarding chromatic changes and teeth sensitivity. Materials and methods: The search was carried out from several databases. The included studies were all systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis of RCT or quasi-RCT. The participants were patients that underwent external dental bleaching in permanent vital teeth. The interventions were in-office (IO) bleaching techniques and at-home (AT) bleaching techniques with different bleaching agents and concentrations. Results: The search resulted in a total of 257 articles, and 28 SR were included in the qualitative analysis and nine in the quantitative analysis. There is no difference between in-office and at-home techniques in terms of color change ( Conclusions: There are no significant differences in terms of color change between the different bleaching techniques compared. Teeth sensitivity is always present regardless of the technique used. The use of light activation systems did not increase the intensity and risk of post-operative sensitivity.

Indexed as

At-home dental bleachingDentin sensitivityEfficacyIn-office dental bleachingTooth bleachingUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID38371984
PMCPMC10873745
OpenAlexW4391515467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.