ArticleHeliyon2024
Delineation of groundwater potential zonation using geoinformatics and AHP techniques with remote sensing data.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering of groundwater potential zones in hard rock terrain using GIS technology with AHP statistical methods: A case study of Nilgiri, Tamil Nadu, India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing Groundwater Potential in the Ziway Lake Watershed Using Geographical Information System, Analytic Hierarchy Process, and Drinking Water Quality Index.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-01-05Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among all other valuable natural resources, groundwater is crucial for global economic growth and food security. This study aimed to delineate groundwater potential zones (GWPZ) in the Gidabo watershed of the Main Ethiopian Rift. The demand for groundwater supplies for various applications has risen recently in the watershed due to rapid population upsurge. An integrated Geographical Information System, Remote Sensing, and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been utilized. Eight groundwater regulating factors, including rainfall, elevation, drainage density, soil types, lineament density, slope, lithology, and land use/land cover, have been taken in the analysis. To assign suitable weights to each factor, AHP was employed, as each element contributes differently to groundwater occurrence. The weighted overlay analysis (WOA) technique was then used in the ArcGIS environment to integrate all thematic layers and generate a GWPZ map. The delineated GWPZ in the watershed was classified into five categories. The poor GWPZ covered 18.7 %, the low GWPZ covered 33.8 %, the moderate GWPZ covered 23.4 %, the high GWPZ covered 18.1 %, and the very high GWPZ covered 5.8 % of the area. Well and spring data were used to validate the model, and the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve method was applied. The results showed good accuracy of 76.8 %. The result of this research can be valuable for planning and managing groundwater resources in the Gidabo watershed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.