ArticleHeliyon2024
Deep learning vs. robust federal learning for distinguishing adrenal metastases from benign lesions with multi-phase CT images.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic segmentation-based radiomics and deep learning combined with clinical parameters for precise differentiation of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas and metastases.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in ischemic stroke images: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Differentiating adrenal adenomas from metastases poses a significant challenge, particularly in patients with a history of extra-adrenal malignancy. This study investigates the performance of three-phase computed tomography (CT) based robust federal learning algorithm and traditional deep learning for distinguishing metastases from benign adrenal lesions. Material and methods: This retrospective analysis includes 1187 instances who underwent three-phase CT scans between January 2008 and March 2021, comprising 720 benign lesions and 467 metastases. Utilizing the three-phase CT images, both a Robust Federal Learning Signature (RFLS) and a traditional Deep Learning Signature (DLS) were constructed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression. Their diagnostic capabilities were subsequently validated and compared using metrics such as the Areas Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUCs), Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Results: Compared with DLS, the RFLS showed better capability in distinguishing metastases from benign adrenal lesions (average AUC: 0.816 vs.0.798, NRI = 0.126, P < 0.072; 0.889 vs.0.838, NRI = 0.209, P < 0.001; 0.903 vs.0.825, NRI = 0.643, p < 0.001) in the four-testing cohort, respectively. DCA showed that the RFLS added more net benefit than DLS for clinical utility. Moreover, Comparison with state-of-the-art federal learning methods, the results once again confirmed that the RFLS significantly improved the diagnostic performance based on three-phase CT (AUC: AP, 0.727 vs. 0.757 vs. 0.739 vs. 0.796; PCP, 0.781 vs. 0.851 vs. 0.790 vs. 0.882; VP, 0.789 vs. 0.814 vs. 0.779 vs. 0.886). Conclusion: RFLS was superior to DLS for preoperative distinguishing metastases from benign adrenal lesions with multi-phase CT Images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.