Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371948›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2024

Using routinely collected data to determine care cascades of hypertension and type-2 diabetes management in China: a cross-sectional study.

Shangzhi Xiong, Wei Jiang, Yongchen Wang, Chi Hu, Jiajuan Yang, Mingjia Bao, Huinan Hou, Fan Li, Tingzhuo Liu, Xinyi Zhang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Shangzhi XiongThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Wei JiangNational Centre for Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Yongchen WangDepartment of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Chi HuYichang City Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Yichang, China.
Jiajuan YangYichang City Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Yichang, China.
Mingjia BaoJiamusi City Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiamusi, China.
Huinan HouJiamusi City Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiamusi, China.
Fan LiHealth Bureau of Wenjiang District, Chengdu, China.
Tingzhuo LiuSchool of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xinyi ZhangSchool of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yanqiuzi MaNational Centre for Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Pengpeng YeThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Qiujun WangDepartment of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Zhengming ChenNuffield Department of Population Health, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Limin MaoCentre for Social Research in Health, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
David PeirisThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Maoyi TianDepartment of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: China's National Essential Public Health Service Package (NEPHSP) aims to promote health for all at the primary health care level and includes a focus on hypertension and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, there are limited contemporary data to quantify the care cascades of hypertension and T2DM in primary health care. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved individual level linkage of routinely collected data from the NEPHSP, health insurance claims and hospital electronic health records, from four diverse regions in China, including Xiling District (central China), Wenchuan County (western), Acheng District and Jiao District (northern). We first compared numbers of people aged ≥35 with a recorded diagnosis of hypertension and T2DM against expected numbers derived from epidemiological data. We then constructed care cascades to assess the percentages (1) enrolled in the NEPHSP, (2) adherent to the follow-up care of NEPHSP, (3) receiving medication treatment, and (4) having hypertension and/or T2DM controlled. Findings: In the four regions, the total numbers of people aged ≥35 diagnosed of hypertension and T2DM from any data source were 149,176 and 50,828, respectively. This was estimated to be 46.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.8%-46.2%) and 45.6% (95% CI: 45.3%-45.9%) of the expected totals for hypertension and T2DM, respectively. Among those diagnosed, 65.4% (95% CI: 65.1%-65.6%) with hypertension and 66.1% (95% CI: 65.7%-66.5%) with T2DM were enrolled in the NEPHSP, respectively, in which 54.8% (95% CI: 54.5%-55.2%) with hypertension and 64.7% (95% CI: 64.1%-65.2%) with T2DM were adherent to the required services. Among those enrolled, the overall treatment rates were 70.8% (95% CI: 70.6%-71.1%) for hypertension and 82.2% (95% CI: 81.8%-82.6%) for T2DM. Among those treated, a further 80.9% (95% CI: 80.6%-81.2%) with hypertension and 73.9% (95% CI: 73.3%-74.4%) with T2DM achieved control. These results varied considerably across regions, with the northern sites showing relatively higher enrolment rates while the central site had higher control rates. Interpretation: Detection and control rates for hypertension and T2DM are suboptimal in these four regions of China. Further strategies are needed to improve people's enrolment in and adherence to the NEPHSP and strengthen care delivery processes. Of note, our estimations of the diagnosis rates for each region are based on national level large epidemiological data. The interpretation of these data needs caution due to potential bias caused by regional variations. Funding: This study is funded by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases funding (APP1169757), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (72074065).

Indexed as

Care cascadeChinaHypertensionNational Essential Public Health ServiceRoutinely collected dataType-2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID38371948
PMCPMC10869296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.