Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371906›Full record

ArticleMachine learning in clinical neuroimaging : 6th international workshop, MLCN 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, proceedings. MLCN (Workshop) (6th : 2023 : Vancouver, B.C.)2023

Copy Number Variation Informs fMRI-based Prediction of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Nicha C Dvornek, Catherine Sullivan, James S Duncan, Abha R Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Machine learning in clinical neuroimaging : 6th international workshop, MLCN 2023, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2023, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 8, 2023, proceedings. MLCN (Workshop) (6th : 2023 : Vancouver, B.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Learning Explainable Imaging-Genetics Associations Related to a Neurological Disorder.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicha C DvornekDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Catherine SullivanDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
James S DuncanDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Abha R GuptaDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Subnetwork-based Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for Therapy Assessment in AutismR01NS035193 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JAMES S DUNCAN, LAWRENCE H. STAIB · 1996 to 2026
$9.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multifactorial etiology of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) suggests that its study would benefit greatly from multimodal approaches that combine data from widely varying platforms, e.g., neuroimaging, genetics, and clinical characterization. Prior neuroimaging-genetic analyses often apply naive feature concatenation approaches in data-driven work or use the findings from one modality to guide posthoc analysis of another, missing the opportunity to analyze the paired multimodal data in a truly unified approach. In this paper, we develop a more integrative model for combining genetic, demographic, and neuroimaging data. Inspired by the influence of genotype on phenotype, we propose using an attention-based approach where the genetic data guides attention to neuroimaging features of importance for model prediction. The genetic data is derived from copy number variation parameters, while the neuroimaging data is from functional magnetic resonance imaging. We evaluate the proposed approach on ASD classification and severity prediction tasks, using a sex-balanced dataset of 228 ASD and typically developing subjects in a 10-fold cross-validation framework. We demonstrate that our attention-based model combining genetic information, demographic data, and functional magnetic resonance imaging results in superior prediction performance compared to other multimodal approaches.

Indexed as

Autism spectrum disorderfMRIGeneticsMultimodal analysis

Identifiers

PMID38371906
PMCPMC10868600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.