Article3 Biotech2024
Temporary immersion systems induce photomixotrophism during in vitro propagation of agave Tobalá.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Two-Phase System for the In Vitro Culture ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Different Bioreactors During In Vitro Shoot Proliferation and Acclimatization of Agave (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An alternative method for in vitro multiplication and rooting of sugarcane using a PET-based temporary immersion bioreactor.3 Biotech · 2025Article
- Innovative aspects of micropropagation in olive.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the photomixotrophic and physiological responses using different temporary immersion systems (TIS) during in vitro multiplication of agave Tobalá. The culture systems were SETIS™ bioreactor, Temporary Immersion Bioreactor (TIB), Monobloc Advance Temporary Immersion System, and semisolid culture medium as the control. At six weeks of culture, different physiological variables were evaluated: chlorophyll content, stomatal index, percentage of closed stomata, Phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and Rubisco during the multiplication stage, and survival percentage in the acclimatization stage. TIS increased multiplication rate (41%), stomatal index (44%), percentage of closed stomata (11%) and chlorophyll content (45%) with respect to the semisolid culture medium system. The highest PEP content (> 35%) was observed in temporary immersion (TI), whereas, Rubisco content, showed no differences among the culture systems evaluated. Regarding survival percentage during acclimatization, the highest shoot survival was obtained in TI, and all regenerate shoots were rooted ex vitro. This study shows that in vitro photomixotrophism was induced in TIS during the multiplication stage. In conclusion, SETIS™ bioreactor and TIB systems are an alternative for mass multiplication of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.