ReviewPolish journal of radiology2024
Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Why should we focus on small aneurysms? A comprehensive update of recent findings.
Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The natural history of untreated small (< 5 mm) intracranial aneurysms: a five-year angiographic follow-up study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Local pressure as a dominant hemodynamic driver of wall enhancement in anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a facet-level computational fluid dynamics and vessel wall imaging analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- High-resolution vessel wall imaging-driven radiomic analysis for the precision prediction of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk: a promising approach.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Association of eNOS T786C genetic polymorphism with the risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.Translational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Lattice innovative flow diverter with mechanical balloons: a new breakthrough and efficacy evaluation in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Endovascular Treatment and Microsurgical Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comprehensive Comparative Study.International journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are a significant public health concern because they have the potential to cause deva-stating consequences, including death and disability. Despite advances in diagnostic and treatment modalities, the outcomes for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) remain poor, with high rates of rebleeding, vasospasm, and cerebral ischaemia. IAs are a significant risk factor for aSAH, and it is estimated that up to 3% of the general population have IAs. Recent studies using novel imaging modalities have shown that the prevalence of IAs may be much higher, with 6.6% of adults aged 40-84 years having intradural saccular IAs ≥ 2 mm. The risk of rupture for IAs is difficult to predict, and the decision to treat them invasively is based on a balance between the estimated rupture risk and the procedural risks of the treatment. However, the mortality and morbidity rates among patients treated for IAs can be as high as 5%. There is a need for clear guidelines on the treatment of IAs, and this review aims to provide an update on recent findings in this area. To achieve this goal, the authors identified and summarized recent, high-impact studies on IAs. The review focuses on the diagnostic and treatment options for IAs, as well as the risks associated with these interventions. The authors also provide an overview of the natural history of IAs and discuss the challenges and uncertainties in managing these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.