Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371893›Full record

ReviewPolish journal of radiology2024

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Why should we focus on small aneurysms? A comprehensive update of recent findings.

Maciej Jakub Frączek, Roger Marek Krzyżewski, Kornelia Maria Kliś, Borys Maria Kwinta, Tadeusz Jan Popiela, Krzysztof Stachura

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maciej Jakub FrączekDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurotraumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Roger Marek KrzyżewskiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurotraumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Kornelia Maria KliśDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurotraumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Borys Maria KwintaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurotraumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Tadeusz Jan PopielaChair of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Krzysztof StachuraDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurotraumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are a significant public health concern because they have the potential to cause deva-stating consequences, including death and disability. Despite advances in diagnostic and treatment modalities, the outcomes for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) remain poor, with high rates of rebleeding, vasospasm, and cerebral ischaemia. IAs are a significant risk factor for aSAH, and it is estimated that up to 3% of the general population have IAs. Recent studies using novel imaging modalities have shown that the prevalence of IAs may be much higher, with 6.6% of adults aged 40-84 years having intradural saccular IAs ≥ 2 mm. The risk of rupture for IAs is difficult to predict, and the decision to treat them invasively is based on a balance between the estimated rupture risk and the procedural risks of the treatment. However, the mortality and morbidity rates among patients treated for IAs can be as high as 5%. There is a need for clear guidelines on the treatment of IAs, and this review aims to provide an update on recent findings in this area. To achieve this goal, the authors identified and summarized recent, high-impact studies on IAs. The review focuses on the diagnostic and treatment options for IAs, as well as the risks associated with these interventions. The authors also provide an overview of the natural history of IAs and discuss the challenges and uncertainties in managing these patients.

Indexed as

anatomyaneurysmcomputed tomography angiographyendovascular therapynatural historyrisk of rupture

Identifiers

PMID38371893
PMCPMC10867953
OpenAlexW4391326169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.