Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371888›Full record

ReviewPolish journal of radiology2024

Deep learning in ovarian cancer diagnosis: a comprehensive review of various imaging modalities.

Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi, Sedigheh Sina, Hamid Omidi, Amir Hossein Farshchitabrizi, Mehrosadat Alavi

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad Hossein SadeghiShiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Sedigheh SinaShiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Hamid OmidiShiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Amir Hossein FarshchitabriziRadiation Research Center, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehrosadat AlaviShiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer poses a major worldwide health issue, marked by high death rates and a deficiency in reliable diagnostic methods. The precise and prompt detection of ovarian cancer holds great importance in advancing patient outcomes and determining suitable treatment plans. Medical imaging techniques are vital in diagnosing ovarian cancer, but achieving accurate diagnoses remains challenging. Deep learning (DL), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has emerged as a promising solution to improve the accuracy of ovarian cancer detection. This systematic review explores the role of DL in improving the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer. The methodology involved the establishment of research questions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a comprehensive search strategy across relevant databases. The selected studies focused on DL techniques applied to ovarian cancer diagnosis using medical imaging modalities, as well as tumour differentiation and radiomics. Data extraction, analysis, and synthesis were performed to summarize the characteristics and findings of the selected studies. The review emphasizes the potential of DL in enhancing the diagnosis of ovarian cancer by accelerating the diagnostic process and offering more precise and efficient solutions. DL models have demonstrated their effectiveness in categorizing ovarian tissues and achieving comparable diagnostic performance to that of experienced radiologists. The integration of DL into ovarian cancer diagnosis holds the promise of improving patient outcomes, refining treatment approaches, and supporting well-informed decision-making. Nevertheless, additional research and validation are necessary to ensure the dependability and applicability of DL models in everyday clinical settings.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdeep learningdiagnostic accuracyovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID38371888
PMCPMC10867948
OpenAlexW4391453550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.