Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371845›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

A Review of Different Manufacturing Methods of Metallic Foams.

Ahmed Hassan, Ibrahim Abdullah Alnaser

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Influence of CaCOACS omega · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed HassanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451 Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-8999
Ibrahim Abdullah AlnaserDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451 Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-8410
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metallic foam is a popular topic due to its diverse industrial applications and unique combination of properties. Metallic foam is significantly lighter than nonfoam metal materials due to its porous structure, which incorporates a substantial amount of air or voids. This lower density makes metallic foam advantageous in applications in which weight reduction is critical. This makes it ideal for the aerospace, automotive, and construction industries; also, its versatile nature continues to make it an attractive material for various industrial applications such as impact absorbers, heat exchangers, and biomedical and marine engineering. However, the choice between metallic foam and nonfoam metal also depends on other factors like mechanical properties, cost, and specific application requirements. This review describes various fabrication methods of metallic foam that include the liquid metallurgy route which uses liquid or semiliquid metal, the powder metallurgy route uses metal in powder form, metal ion, and the metal vapor route which uses electrolytic deposition method to produce metallic foam. These methods include direct gas injection, adding blowing agents in solid or liquid metals, investment casting, the addition of a space holder in the precursor, metallic ion, vapor deposition on a polymer sponge, and many more. The morphology of metallic foam depends upon the method that is chosen for fabrication, and up to 98% porosity can be achieved by these methods. Additive manufacturing for metallic foam fabrication is an emerging field based on selective laser melting and electron beam melting principles. It has exceptional possibilities for generating complicated 3D shapes and customizing the material characteristics. The main purpose of this review article is to give significant insights into the various production procedures for metallic foams to researchers, engineers, and industry experts, assisting in the selection of acceptable methods depending on individual application needs. This review investigates the manufacturing conditions for metallic foams and finally discusses their advantages, drawbacks, and obstacles in mass production. The findings add to current efforts to expand metallic foam technology and encourage its wider application across diverse sectors, opening the path for future research and development.

Identifiers

PMID38371845
PMCPMC10870358
OpenAlexW4391535282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.