ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Clinical efficacy analysis of partial cystectomy and radical cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive sarcomatoid carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case series: Four cases of urothelial carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study compares the clinical efficacy of partial cystectomy (PC) versus radical cystectomy (RC) in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (SCUB) through a retrospective analysis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 20 patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive SCUB from July 2015 to August 2023 at Ganzhou People's Hospital. All patients underwent surgical treatment followed by chemotherapy, with 9 receiving PC and 11 undergoing RC. We compared the average survival time of deceased patients for both treatments and conducted survival and multivariate analyses using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model, respectively. Results: All 20 patients were postoperatively diagnosed with muscle-invasive SCUB and were followed up for 4 to 60 months. The average survival time for patients undergoing PC was 11.5 months, with survival rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years of 55.56%, 22.22%, and 11.11%, respectively. In contrast, patients receiving RC had an extended average survival time of 22.5 months, and their 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates increased to 63.64%, 36.36%, and 18.18%, respectively. Survival analysis revealed statistically significant differences in prognosis between PC and RC for the treatment of muscle-invasive SCUB (P<0.05). Conclusion: SCUB is a rare malignant tumor with unique biological characteristics often associated with poor prognosis. Upon diagnosis, RC should be considered as an early treatment approach when the patient's overall condition permits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.