Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371395›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2023

Practical Tips for using a Human Library approach In medical education.

Rebecca Malhi, Grace Perez, Javeria Shafiq, Aaron Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca MalhiDistributed Learning and Rural Initiatives, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-1061
Grace PerezDistributed Learning and Rural Initiatives, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6027-0825
Javeria ShafiqDistributed Learning and Rural Initiatives, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4585-7978
Aaron JohnstonDistributed Learning and Rural Initiatives, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8016-6937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Human Library is a structured event that brings people from different groups together. It simulates the format of a customary library, with 'Readers' borrowing 'Books', who are human volunteers sharing their lived experiences and perspectives. Rooted in principles of social psychology, Human Libraries provide opportunities for Books and Readers to interact in meaningful dialogue. The goal of each interaction is to give the Reader new understanding of the Book's life. The Human Library was originally developed as a strategy to challenge prejudice through conversation and personal connection, but the approach is remarkably versatile. We repurposed it for a medical education context in order to provide learners in medical school with information and inspiration, particularly about rural life and rural medicine. We organized and held two Human Library events where pre-medical and undergraduate medical students (Readers) engaged in dialogue with rural physicians (Books). However, the strategy could be used to address a wide variety of challenging subjects where the potential Readers are biased or lack experience. This article draws upon research literature and our own experiences of running Human Library events to give practical advice for other organizations who might want to use this novel approach in medical education.

Indexed as

attitudinal changeHuman Libraryprejudice reductionrecruitmentrural medicineundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID38371395
PMCPMC10873544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.