Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371358›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Personalized modeling of Alzheimer's disease progression estimates neurodegeneration severity from EEG recordings.

Lorenzo Gaetano Amato, Alberto Arturo Vergani, Michael Lassi, Carlo Fabbiani, Salvatore Mazzeo, Rachele Burali, Benedetta Nacmias, Sandro Sorbi, Riccardo Mannella, Antonello Grippo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lorenzo Gaetano AmatoThe BioRobotics Institute Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa Italy.
Alberto Arturo VerganiThe BioRobotics Institute Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa Italy.
Michael LassiThe BioRobotics Institute Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa Italy.
Carlo FabbianiIRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Florence Italy.
Salvatore MazzeoIRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Florence Italy.
Rachele BuraliIRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Florence Italy.
Benedetta NacmiasIRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Florence Italy.
Sandro SorbiIRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Florence Italy.
Riccardo MannellaUniversità di Pisa Dipartimento di Fisica Pisa Italy.
Antonello GrippoIRCSS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Florence Italy.
Valentina BessiDepartment of Neuroscience Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health Careggi University Hospital Florence Italy.
Alberto MazzoniThe BioRobotics Institute Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is necessary for a timely onset of therapeutic care. However, cortical structural alterations associated with AD are difficult to discern.

methodsWe developed a cortical model of AD-related neurodegeneration accounting for slowing of local dynamics and global connectivity degradation. In a monocentric study we collected electroencephalography (EEG) recordings at rest from participants in healthy (HC,

resultsOur model outperformed standard EEG analysis not only in discriminating between HC and MCI conditions (F1 score 0.95 vs 0.75) but also in identifying SCD patients with biological hallmarks of AD in the cerebrospinal fluid (recall 0.87 vs 0.50). DISCUSSION: Personalized models could (1) support classification of MCI, (2) assess the presence of AD pathology, and (3) estimate the risk of cognitive decline progression, based only on economical and non-invasive EEG recordings. Highlights: Personalized cortical model estimating structural alterations from EEG recordings.Discrimination of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Healthy (HC) subjects (95%)Prediction of biological markers of Alzheimer's in Subjective Decline (SCD) Subjects (87%)Transition correctly predicted for 3/3 subjects that converted from SCD to MCI after 1y.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseComputational modelsComputational neuroscienceEEGNovel Biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38371358
PMCPMC10870085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.