ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024
Uncovering hub genes and immunological characteristics for heart failure utilizing RRA, WGCNA and Machine learning.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network toxicology deciphers micro- and nanoplastics-mediated mixture hazard, predictive risk assessment, and regulatory translation.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Plasma proteins and mechanisms involved in the evolvement of cardiac function after myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis of gene expression and histone modifications for DES, DSP, GJA1 and SMOC2 in adipose tissue reveals potential relationship to cardiometabolic health.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Identification of signature genes and subtypes for heart failure diagnosis based on machine learning.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue with high mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to find potential diagnostic markers for HF by the combination of bioinformatics analysis and machine learning, as well as analyze the role of immune infiltration in the pathological process of HF. Methods: The gene expression profiles of 124 HF patients and 135 nonfailing donors (NFDs) were obtained from six datasets in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public database. We applied robust rank aggregation (RRA) and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) method to identify critical genes in HF. To discover novel diagnostic markers in HF, three machine learning methods were employed, including best subset regression, regularization technique, and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE). Besides, immune infiltration was investigated in HF by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Results: Combining RRA with WGCNA method, we recognized 39 critical genes associated with HF. Through integrating three machine learning methods, FCN3 and SMOC2 were determined as novel diagnostic markers in HF. Differences in immune infiltration signature were also found between HF patients and NFDs. Moreover, we explored the potential associations between two diagnostic markers and immune response in the pathogenesis of HF. Conclusions: In summary, FCN3 and SMOC2 can be used as diagnostic markers of HF, and immune infiltration plays an important role in the initiation and progression of HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.