Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371201›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2024

Confirmatory structural validation and refinement of the Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Symptom Scale.

Abigail F Newlands, Melissa Kramer, Lindsey Roberts, Kayleigh Maxwell, Jessica L Price, Katherine A Finlay

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07698041 (Developing and Validating Two New Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07698041 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Developing and Validating Two New Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms: A Symptoms Diary and Adapted Measure for Older Adults

TypeobservationalSponsorKatherine FinlayRan2026 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsUrology, Urological Diseases, Patient Satisfaction, Pain, ChronicArmsNon-interventional Patient Reported Outcome Measure Development (RUTISS-Diary), Non-interventional Patient Reported Outcome Measure Development (RUTISS-65)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Abigail F NewlandsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences University of Reading Reading UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4718-0075
Melissa KramerLive UTI Free Ltd Dublin Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-5203
Lindsey RobertsSchool of Psychology University of Buckingham Buckingham UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5277-2377
Kayleigh MaxwellDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences University of Stirling Stirling UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8747-7201
Jessica L PriceLive UTI Free Ltd Dublin Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0487-0826
Katherine A FinlaySchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences University of Reading Reading UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-2652
Free University of Ireland · IEUniversity of Reading · GBUniversity of Buckingham · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To confirm the structural validity of the Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Symptom Scale (RUTISS), determining whether a bifactor model appropriately fits the questionnaire's structure and identifying areas for refinement. Used in conjunction with established clinical testing methods, this patient-reported outcome measure addresses the urgent need to validate the patient perspective. Patients and methods: A clinically and demographically diverse sample of 389 people experiencing recurrent UTI across 37 countries (96.9% female biological sex, aged 18-87 years) completed the RUTISS online. A bifactor graded response model was fitted to the data, identifying potential items for deletion if they indicated significant differential item functioning (DIF) based on sociodemographic characteristics, contributed to local item dependence or demonstrated poor fit or discrimination capability. Results: The final RUTISS comprised a 3-item symptom frequency section, a 1-item global rating of change scale and an 11-item general 'rUTI symptom and pain severity' subscale with four sub-factor domains measuring 'urinary symptoms', 'urinary presentation', 'UTI pain and discomfort' and 'bodily sensations'. The bifactor model fit indices were excellent (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.041, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.995, standardised root mean square residual [SRMSR] = 0.047), and the mean-square fit statistics indicated that all items were productive for measurement (mean square fit indices [MNSQ] = 0.64 - 1.29). Eighty-one per cent of the common model variance was accounted for by the general factor and sub-factors collectively, and all factor loadings were greater than 0.30 and communalities greater than 0.60. Items indicated high discrimination capability (slope parameters > 1.35). Conclusion: The 15-item RUTISS is a patient-generated, psychometrically robust questionnaire that dynamically assesses the patient experience of recurrent UTI symptoms and pain. This brief tool offers the unique opportunity to enhance patient-centred care by supporting shared decision-making and patient monitoring.

Indexed as

bifactor modelchronic painitem response theorypatient‐reported outcomesrecurrent urinary tract infectionwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID38371201
PMCPMC10869661
OpenAlexW4387331966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.