Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371124›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Efficacy of the Ponseti Method in the Management of Clubfoot: A Systematic Review.

Hassan B Maghfuri, Ali A Alshareef

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hassan B MaghfuriOrthopedic Surgery, Ministry of Health, Jizan, SAU.
Ali A AlshareefOrthopedic Surgery, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Khamis Mushait, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clubfoot is a congenital abnormality of the lower extremities, and it may be unilateral or bilateral. Left untreated, it may lead to issues with walking. Additionally, inappropriate treatment or the lack of treatment can result in functional damage. The goal of clubfoot treatment is to correct the deformities of the involved components. The Ponseti method has been regarded as the gold standard for the treatment of clubfoot as it is safe and effective. In this review, we aimed to assess the success of the Ponseti method in the treatment of clubfoot by reviewing the previous studies on this subject. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, for relevant articles spanning the period from 2018 to 2023. The keywords used in the search were "Ponseti method, Treatment, Outcomes, Success, Relapse, Failure, and Rates." The inclusion criteria were original articles in English on clubfoot patients treated with the Ponseti method. While our search yielded a total of 1,037 articles, only nine were deemed eligible for analysis based on the inclusion criteria. The articles involved a total of 537 feet of 358 patients and the age of the patients ranged from one day to five years. The success rate ranged between 55% and 100%, and the relapse rate ranged between 3.2% and 34.2%. Based on our findings, the Ponseti method has a high success rate in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot, and hence it is an excellent conservative method of treatment. However, there are additional factors that may affect the treatment outcomes, which need to be taken into account.

Indexed as

clubfootfoot deformityponsetiratesuccess

Identifiers

PMID38371124
PMCPMC10873899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.