Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371117›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Antepartum Rupture of the Posterior Uterine Wall in a Woman With Two Previous Cesarean Deliveries.

Marina Gato, Catarina Castro, Luísa Pinto

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina GatoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, PRT.
Catarina CastroDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, PRT.
Luísa PintoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, PRT.
Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine rupture is a rare pregnancy complication. In patients with a previous cesarean delivery, it usually involves the scarred area. Uterine rupture of the posterior wall is even rarer and mostly described during labor. Conditions that confer fragility to the posterior uterine wall have been associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture. There are very few cases of spontaneous posterior uterine wall rupture in a non-labor setting in pregnant women without risk factors. We report the case of a pregnant woman admitted to the hospital due to placental abruption at 26 weeks' gestation. Once fetal and maternal stability were assured, expectant management was maintained. At 29 weeks, an emergent cesarean delivery due to fetal bradycardia was performed, and a large rupture of the posterior uterine wall was diagnosed. Subsequently, a hysterectomy was performed. The patient was discharged nine days after the procedure and the newborn on the 64th day of life.

Indexed as

cesarean sectionhysterectomyneonatal outcomespregnancyuterine rupture

Identifiers

PMID38371117
PMCPMC10874257
OpenAlexW4390967547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.