Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38371073›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Development and Usability of an Inexpensive and Reusable Phantom for Ultrasound-Guided Needle Cannulation.

Jacob Linnet, Magnús P Obinah, Mikkel H Madsen, Magnus M Møller, Lene Russell, Kim Ekelund, Morten B Svendsen, Ebbe Thinggaard

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob LinnetMedical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.
Magnús P ObinahPlastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, DNK.
Mikkel H MadsenAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, DNK.
Magnus M MøllerMedical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.
Lene RussellAnesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, DNK.
Kim EkelundMedical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.
Morten B SvendsenMedical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.
Ebbe ThinggaardMedical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, DNK.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement (UG-PVCP) is a key skill for establishing intravenous access, especially in patients with anatomical challenges. Ultrasound is highly operator-dependent, and it is essential to ensure a sufficient level of competence when educating healthcare professionals. Competence can be acquired through simulation-based training (SBT) using phantoms or simulators. We developed a phantom for SBT, and in this study, we explore the phantom's usability and technical fidelity. Methods Novices with no experience in UG-PVCP and experts who routinely performed the procedure were asked to perform three ultrasound-guided catheter placement attempts on the phantom. Afterward, they were asked to complete a usability questionnaire consisting of 14 questions exploring the usability and fidelity of the phantom. Results Fifty-seven participants were included in the study: 29 novices and 28 experts. When assessing positive questions about the frequency of use, ease of use, integration of functionality, quickness to learn, and confidence level, the study showed a median score of 4 to 5 out of 5 in the two groups. The median was 1 to 2 out of 5 for negative questions assessing cumbersomeness, unnecessary complexity, and model inconsistency. In an additional comment textbox, one participant mentioned that the cannulation did not feel realistic but that it was good for cannulation practice. Conclusions We believe the phantom is suitable for an educational curriculum since it shows a high level of usability, scoring high on positive questions while scoring low on negative questions, and having high functional fidelity.

Indexed as

anesthesiologyemergency medicineperipheral vein cathetersimulation trainerultrasound guidedultrasound phantom

Identifiers

PMID38371073
PMCPMC10874636
OpenAlexW4391017467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.